Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Il 20/12/2017 09:34, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: On 20/12/2017 09:33, Fabio Martelli wrote: Il 20/12/2017 08:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay tuned. Hi Francesco, sorry but I just discovered a bug about

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

On 20/12/2017 09:33, Fabio Martelli wrote: Il 20/12/2017 08:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay tuned. Hi Francesco, sorry but I just discovered a bug about the latest yesterday changes. I'm ready with a fix,

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Il 20/12/2017 08:56, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay tuned. Hi Francesco, sorry but I just discovered a bug about the latest yesterday changes. I'm ready with a fix, please, let me perform some changes ant test

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Hi all, given the consensus, I am about to start the release process. Stay tuned. Regards. On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

+1. Colm. On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Lorenzo Di Cola wrote: > +1 for me. > > Best Regards > > LDC > > > Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: > >> Hi all, >> it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

+1 for me. Best Regards LDC Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

+1 Filipe Silva On 19-12-2017 07:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a nice

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

+1 Massi Il 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a nice

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Il 19 dicembre 2017 08:50:15 CET, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" ha scritto: >Hi all, >it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the > >remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I >was thinking: what about delivering Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Hi all, it looks like it is the right moment to me. Matteo. On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Hi, it sounds very good to me, +1. Regards and merry Christmas to all! Matteo Alessandroni On 19/12/2017 08:50, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I

Re: [DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Definitely +1, Best regards and merry Christmas to all!  Andrea Il giorno 19 dic 2017, 08:50, alle ore 08:50, "Francesco Chicchiriccò" ha scritto: >Hi all, >it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the > >remaining issues [2] can be safely

[DISCUSS] Time for 2.0.7?

Hi all, it seems quite some work has been done for 2.0.7 [1], and I believe the remaining issues [2] can be safely moved to 2.0.8 (or later), hence I was thinking: what about delivering Apache Syncope 2.0.7 as a nice Christmas present to our community? Do you see any issue with that?