Re: BasicAuth realm String

2013-02-28 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
On 27/02/13 14:27, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi Sergey, I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as suggested (say

Re: BasicAuth realm String

2013-02-27 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi On 27/02/13 07:49, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi all, The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following: private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic realm=\Spring Security Application\; I propose to change this

Re: BasicAuth realm String

2013-02-27 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi Sergey, I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be

BasicAuth realm String

2013-02-26 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi all, The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following: private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic realm=\Spring Security Application\; I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when authenticating to access the new CXF-based REST API as

Re: BasicAuth realm String

2013-02-26 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: Hi all, The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following: private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic realm=\Spring Security Application\; I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when