On 27/02/13 14:27, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi Sergey,
I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using
Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name
customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as
suggested (say
Hi
On 27/02/13 07:49, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following:
private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic
realm=\Spring Security Application\;
I propose to change this
Hi Sergey,
I guess using the name of the framework might be problematic when using
Syncope within some custom deployments; I'd vote for getting the realm name
customized via a property, and defaulted to a more neutral name as
suggested (say Identity Provision or Management, etc) or may be
Hi all,
The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following:
private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic
realm=\Spring Security Application\;
I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when
authenticating to access the new CXF-based REST API as
On 26/02/2013 23:03, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote:
Hi all,
The core's RestServiceExceptionMapper defines the following:
private static final String BASIC_REALM_UNAUTHORIZED = Basic
realm=\Spring Security Application\;
I propose to change this to a more neutral realm, as this appears when