Hi Francesco,
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013 um 10:20 Uhr
> Von: "Francesco Chicchiriccò"
> >> Gesendet: Montag, 09. Dezember 2013 um 22:22 Uhr
> >> Von: "Oliver Wulff"
> >>
> >> @Guido, is the property "connectionProperties" sufficient which is a
> >> semi-colon separated string:
> >>
e dependent. But maybe
the connectionProperties property is sufficient.
Thanks
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 09 December 2013 09:29
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 0
erty is sufficient.
>
> Thanks
> Oli
>
> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
> Sent: 09 December 2013 09:29
> To: dev@syncope.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
>
> On 08/12/2013 14:
completely BasicDataSource dependent. But maybe
the connectionProperties property is sufficient.
Thanks
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 09 December 2013 09:29
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
gards.
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 December 2013 16:21
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 06/12/2013 16:17, Guido Wimmel wrote:
Hi,
I wouldn't keep Oliver from providing a patch wrt. his original r
will take care of this: please
(1) consider *all* persistence.properties found under core/
(2) include commons-dbcp 1.4 as direct dependency either in root
pom.xml () and core/pom.xml.
Regards.
> Gesendet: Freitag, 06. Dezember 2013 um 15:38 Uhr
> Von: "Oliver Wulff"
> An: "dev@syncope.a
ound under core/
(2) include commons-dbcp 1.4 as direct dependency either in root
pom.xml () and core/pom.xml.
Regards.
Gesendet: Freitag, 06. Dezember 2013 um 15:38 Uhr
Von: "Oliver Wulff"
An: "dev@syncope.apache.org"
Betreff: RE: BasicDataSource usage in
, and about the isolation level setting (maybe
one
could make this configurable as well, with default READ_COMMITTED?).
Cheers,
Guido
Gesendet: Freitag, 06. Dezember 2013 um 15:38 Uhr
Von: "Oliver Wulff"
An: "dev@syncope.apache.org"
Betreff: RE: BasicDataSource usage in pers
Will do ;-)
Cheers
Oli
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [ilgro...@apache.org]
Sent: 06 December 2013 13:22
To: dev@syncope.apache.org
Subject: Re: BasicDataSource usage in persistence.xml
On 06/12/2013 12:49, Guido Wimmel wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> FY
On 06/12/2013 12:49, Guido Wimmel wrote:
Hi Oliver,
FYI: we use such a setup (with dbcp.BasicDataSource) in our project, thus
avoiding the need to
configure a data source in the container. This works fine; also with our own
unit/integration tests.
We also used the standard MySQL isolation lev
Hi Oliver,
FYI: we use such a setup (with dbcp.BasicDataSource) in our project, thus
avoiding the need to
configure a data source in the container. This works fine; also with our own
unit/integration tests.
We also used the standard MySQL isolation level (REPEATABLE_READ), as we had
problems w
On 05/12/2013 21:47, Oliver Wulff wrote:
Hi there
Hi Oliver,
Wouldn't it make sense to use a BasicDataSource instead of
DriverManagerDataSource as it is also recommended from Spring:
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/jdbc.html#jdbc-connections
Short
Hi there
Wouldn't it make sense to use a BasicDataSource instead of
DriverManagerDataSource as it is also recommended from Spring:
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/spring-framework-reference/html/jdbc.html#jdbc-connections
Instead of this:
13 matches
Mail list logo
