On 16.01.2013 15:58, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 16/01/2013 15:46, Christian Schneider wrote:
>> Hi Francesco,
>>
>> I put these interfaces in the beans package as they are referenced by
>> classes in persistence. You are right that they should go to a better
>> named package. The problem wi
On 16/01/2013 15:46, Christian Schneider wrote:
Hi Francesco,
I put these interfaces in the beans package as they are referenced by classes
in persistence. You are right that they should go to a better named package.
The problem with core.sync and core.propagation is that
these packages have h
Hi Francesco,
I put these interfaces in the beans package as they are referenced by
classes in persistence. You are right that they should go to a better
named package. The problem with core.sync and core.propagation is that
these packages have heavy dependencies to most other parts of the system.
Hi all,
while reviewing some wiki pages, I've unexpectedly found that
PropagationActions, SyncActions and SyncResult were put in package
org.apache.syncope.core.persistence.beans
This package, as its name suggests, is meant for JPA entities, not for
interfaces having their own package (org.ap
