Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-07-07 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi all, having received a whole positive feedback, I am going to create a new 1_2_X branch from trunk. Regards. On 03/07/2014 14:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: HI all, I am resurrecting this old thread because almost all issues for 1.2.0 have been resolved

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-07-04 Thread Marco Di Sabatino Di Diodoro
Il giorno 03/lug/2014, alle ore 14:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò ilgro...@apache.org ha scritto: HI all, I am resurrecting this old thread because almost all issues for 1.2.0 have been resolved

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-07-04 Thread andrea patricelli
Il 03/07/2014 14:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: HI all, I am resurrecting this old thread because almost all issues for 1.2.0 have been resolved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE/fixforversion/12322505/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-issues-panel

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-07-03 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
HI all, I am resurrecting this old thread because almost all issues for 1.2.0 have been resolved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYNCOPE/fixforversion/12322505/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:version-issues-panel I am proposing to enter in a feature-freeze phase for

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-07-03 Thread Fabio Martelli
Il 03/07/2014 14:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: HI all, I am resurrecting this old thread because almost all issues for 1.2.0 have been resolved

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-07-03 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
+1. Colm. On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Fabio Martelli fabio.marte...@gmail.com wrote: Il 03/07/2014 14:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: HI all, I am resurrecting this old thread because almost all issues for 1.2.0 have been resolved

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-02-20 Thread Fabio Martelli
Il 20/02/2014 08:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto: Hello there, lately CXF and LOG4J2 published their updated milestone releases (3.0.0-milestone2 and 2.0-rc1 respectively), hence our current trunk (1.2.0-SNAPSHOT) does not depend from SNAPSHOT releases any more (well, at least for the

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-02-20 Thread Massimiliano Perrone
On 02/20/2014 08:45 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote: Hello there, lately CXF and LOG4J2 published their updated milestone releases (3.0.0-milestone2 and 2.0-rc1 respectively), hence our current trunk (1.2.0-SNAPSHOT) does not depend from SNAPSHOT releases any more (well, at least for the

Re: [DISCUSS] Syncope 1.2.0M1 (WAS Re: Work for next major release 1.2.0)

2014-02-20 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Sure, it makes sense. Colm. On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Massimiliano Perrone massimiliano.perr...@tirasa.net wrote: On 02/20/2014 08:45 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccň wrote: Hello there, lately CXF and LOG4J2 published their updated milestone releases (3.0.0-milestone2 and 2.0-rc1

Work for next major release 1.2.0

2014-02-07 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
Hi fellow Syncopers, lately we have been experimenting a very quiet period around here (take a look at diagram showing at http://syncope.markmail.org to get a confirmation). I know this just probably means that everyone - including me - is busy with other (likely paid) tasks, but I want to