Re: Weighted Statistical Estimates

2017-02-18 Thread Niketan Pansare
+1 Thanks, Niketan > On Feb 18, 2017, at 10:01 PM, Arvind Surve wrote: > > +1 --Arvind Surve Spark Technology Center > http://www.spark.tc/ > > From: Felix Schüler > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org >

Re: Weighted Statistical Estimates

2017-02-18 Thread Glenn Weidner
+1 Thanks, Glenn From: Arvind Surve To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" Date: 02/18/2017 10:01 PM Subject:Re: Weighted Statistical Estimates +1 --     Arvind Surve     Spark

Re: Weighted Statistical Estimates

2017-02-18 Thread Arvind Surve
+1 --     Arvind Surve     Spark Technology Center      http://www.spark.tc/ From: Felix Schüler To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 9:42 PM Subject: Re: Weighted Statistical Estimates Sounds good! -Felix On

Weighted Statistical Estimates

2017-02-18 Thread Matthias Boehm
Going toward to our 1.0 release, I'd like to create consistency across our weighted statistics. Conceptually, theses weights represent frequency counts, i.e., multiplicities of input values. So far, our documentation does not state any restrictions on these weights but some runtime operations

Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #818

2017-02-18 Thread jenkins
See Changes: [Glenn Weidner] [SYSTEMML-1246] Use correct jar name in sparkDML.sh of -bin artifact [npansar] [SYSTEMML-1238] Updated the default parameters of mllearn to match that [Glenn Weidner] [SYSTEMML-1211] Update