Re: Time To Merge Spark 2.0 Support PR

he master branch. -- Mike Dusenberry GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry Sent from my iPhone. > On Jan 9, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Based on discussion thread we will start creating SystemML release based on

Re: Time To Merge Spark 2.0 Support PR

cument the Spark support in our release notes, there should not be any confusion on usage :) Thanks, Niketan Pansare IBM Almaden Research Center E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar Acs S ---01/06/2017 12:57:53 PM---I would agree to

Re: Release cadence

We need to release SystemML on more frequent basis to get community engaged. It will provide us more feedback on functionality we add.While releasing SystemML on monthly basis is challenge due to longer phase of validation process we need to find a way to be quicker. I can propose options to

Re: Time To Merge Spark 2.0 Support PR

We are trying to get SystemML 0.12 release out, which slowed down due to holiday period in last 2+ weeksFinal verification pending from Glen (Niketan, Berthed) related to run wrappers related code with 80GB data. Once this get verified we should be in position to release 0.12 and then can plan

Re: GSoc 2017

Thanks Krishna for your interest in SystemML. You can contribute to SystemML in various ways:    - Providing fix or new feature. Fix/Feature could be identified by you or anybody else.    - Writing new algorithm.    - Writing/updating documentation    - Validating release candidate builds    -

Re: test suite running slowly after disable cache/sparse commit?

+1 On adding Jenkins Build machines on PR builds. Couple of times I hit waiting PR builds due to queue. If that is not common, we can wait. -Arvind From: Deron Eriksson To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 7:34 AM Subject: Re:

Re: Release process document for SystemML

. Send results of voting   9. Copy images to right location   10. Update SystemML web page I will look at Jira SYSTEMML-848 little later. ThanksArvind From: Deron Eriksson <deroneriks...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org; Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com> Sent: Friday, November

Release process document for SystemML

Hi Luciano, Do we have document describing SystemML release process from end to end (Starting from build, tagging RC, and publishing images)?Once Pip Install artifact issue get resolved we want to create another release based on SystemML 0.11 to add Pip Install artifact, possibly next week.

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #631

14:37:58 Running org.apache.sysml.test.integration.functions.data.FullReblockTest 14:37:58 Tests run: 54, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 540.248 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.sysml.test.integration.functions.data.FullReblockTest 14:37:58

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Verified notebook examples with latest jar file. +1 -Arvind From: Glenn Weidner To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 10:46 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5) Repeated performance test suite for XS, S,

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

For now, we should document every artifacts being created in release doc (and/or website), which can be updated when artifacts get reduced. -Arvind From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> Se

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

For some reason, I got an impression that artifacts reduction was completed earlier, but apparently its not.We are trying to reduce number of artifacts to avoid confusion to users.This is an issue from earlier releases as well, not being introduced as a part of SystemML 0.11 release. We can

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

SYSTEMML-1076, SYSTEMML-1077 issues are related to experimental feature DeepLearning/GPU being added to SystemML 0.11. These issues are specific to condition articulated in Jira's.We should have Jira opened and fixed before we can support DeepLearning/GPU fully.For now these should not be

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

+1 -Arvind From: Glenn Weidner To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 11:07 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4) Completed performance test suite for: XS scenarios (80MB) S scenarios (800MB) M scenarios

Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas

I like #4 as well. +1 on #4. -Arvind From: Berthold Reinwald To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 12:34 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas +1 on #4. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden Research Center office:

[VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML version 0.11.0-incubating ! The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating [ ] -1 Do not release this package

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

I have delivered fix for Jira SYSTEMML-1056 issue early morning. Berthold has verified it in his environment on reasonably large data as well.. We are ready to create 0.11 RC4. Luciano, Can you please create RC4 soon?  ThanksArvind From: "dusenberr...@gmail.com"

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

So far all issues Glen has seen based on running unit test cases using Spark 1.6 are related to Test Case code itself, not base code. Probably we don't need to include that change at this hour for 0.11 unless there are any critical issues we need to get in. -Arvind From: Niketan Pansare

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC2) (Correction on Poll closing date)

This poll has started today on Oct 8th, and will remain open for at least 72 hours.It will close on Tuesday, Oct 11th if passes with majority of at least 3 + 1 PMC votes are cast. -Arvind From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apach

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC2)

I believe there is typo in voting close day and date. Luciano, can you please resend it with updated day and date? -Arvind From: Luciano Resende To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2016 10:39 AM Subject: [VOTE] Apache SystemML

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

there is one more > nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right > indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is > in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this > too. > > Regards, > Matthias

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

Imran has opened Jira 1013.  -Arvind From: Matthias Boehm <mbo...@us.ibm.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1) ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too. Regards, Matthias

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

; Matthias > > > > > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 > 10:44:51 > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. > > > Th]Matthias > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10

[VOTE] Please vote to have Apache SystemML 0.11 release

Please vote on making Apache SystemML 0.11 release available -Arvind

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0

I would agree to most of the part except that there would be need to have SystemML support on Spark 2.0 for "Spark As A Service" (or DSX). I haven't seen formal request for Spark 2.0 support from SAAS/DSX team yet, but I heard they are targeting 09/30. In such situation, I would like to  

Re: New SystemML website design

Yes, its very nice redesign (for landing page). Thanks Jeremy for your effort in short period of time, and rest of the team to provide needed resources. Given a limited time, effort was to focus on first page when visitors visit home page.There is lot to be done to re-organize rest of the pages,

Re: Calling System ML from sparkR

Its in very early stage. Connection between HydraR and SystemML has been enabled, with pending functionality (dev/testing).It will take some time to get into mature state. We will keep you posted through Apache SystemML site. -Arvind From: Sourav Mazumder

[DISCUSS] SystemML with Spark 2.0 support and roadmap

Spark 2.0 has released, we need to support SystemML on Spark 2.0 to be uptodate with latest version of Spark. This brings us a challenge to support our consumers until they move to Spark 2.0.Based on some brainstorming, I can propose following options to keep SystemML being supported on latest

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1)

+1 -Arvind From: Niketan Pansare To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 3:24 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC1) Sorry for late reply. +1 for 0.10 release. Thanks, Niketan Pansare IBM Almaden Research

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #150

infrastructure team or not, I was told to let infrastructure know about issue for possible resolution. -Arvind From: Gav <ipv6g...@gmail.com> To: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com> Cc: Apache Infrastructure <infrastruct...@apache.org>; "mwdus...@us.ibm.com" <mwdus...@us

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #150

Changes are push to apache master, last night but those changes are not reflected in Git Repo yet. I can see these changes in my local repository and in Git Master Repository through my Eclipse environment.I cannot see these changes when I browse it through browser though. Seems like Matthias