Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests

My preference is option 3. Thanks, Glenn From: Arvind Surve To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" Date: 04/28/2017 11:09 AM Subject:Re: Build passed/failed messages for pull requests Agree, these

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating (RC4)

+1 Successfully ran Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, SVM in Python notebooks with Spark 2.0.2 (in cloud environment) and Spark 2.1 (on local test cluster) after pip install of RC4 python artifact systemml-0.14.0-incubating-python.tgz. Also ran Linear Regression Conjugate

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML Graduation

+1 Thank you Luciano for starting the discussion and for all the guidance you've provided from the beginning of the project. I agree that the Apache SystemML community has grown and achieved many exciting things during incubation. For example, today we completed our fifth release of Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.13.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 Successfully ran LinearRegression, LogisticRegression, NaiveBayes, SVM in python 2.7 notebook against clean spark 2.0.2 instance after pip install of RC2 python artifact systemml-0.13.0-incubating-python.tgz. --Glenn From: Matthias Boehm To:

Re: Weighted Statistical Estimates

+1 Thanks, Glenn From: Arvind Surve To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" Date: 02/18/2017 10:01 PM Subject:Re: Weighted Statistical Estimates +1 --     Arvind Surve     Spark

Re: Namespace handling w/ imports

Use of source filenames instead of default namespace helped address various issues and tasks under https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-590 that were encountered when creating the SystemML-NN script library. Unit tests were also added to cover different import scenarios. As I recall,

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2)

-incubating (RC2) Thanks, Glenn. Did you run LinearRegression, etc. in the Python Notebook? Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM Almaden Research Center office: (408) 927 2208; T/L: 457 2208 e-mail: reinw...@us.ibm.com From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS To: dev

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2)

, SVM. Regards, Glenn From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 01/27/2017 05:46 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2) Thank you Matthias! I definitely agree with bringing the S, M, L scenarios to within a few

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2)

adcast constraints are exceeded. Given the goal of a fast release process, we might want to update the perftest to bring scenarions S, M, and L to something like 2 days. Regards, Matthias On 1/28/2017 12:10 AM, Glenn Weidner wrote: > Successfully completed performance testing including medium and l

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.12.0-incubating (RC2)

Successfully completed performance testing including medium and large data sets for Binomial, Clustering, Multinomial (subset), Regression, and Statistics tests. Regards, Glenn From: Arvind Surve To: Dev Date: 01/26/2017

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #672

Merged hotfix for excluding files reported in rat.txt: * Summary --- Generated at: 2016-12-07T02:31:43-06:00 Notes: 21 Binaries: 15 Archives: 1 Standards: 3175 Apache Licensed: 3170 Generated Documents: 0 JavaDocs are generated and so

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #635

We've modified the Jenkins Daily Test job configuration so the workspace does not get deleted right after the build completes. Next time, the detailed test logs will be available at: https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/jenkins/job/SystemML-DailyTest/ws/target/failsafe-reports/ Thanks, Glenn From:

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #631

I believe the instrumented information would be found in target/failsafe-reports/org.apache.sysml.test.integration.functions.data.FullReblockTest-output.txt. The failsafe-reports folder contains detailed output log files for each test. Unfortunately, it appears the workspace for that build is

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5) +1 Thanks, Niketan Pansare IBM Almaden Research Center E-mail: npansar At us.ibm.com http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view.php?person=us-npansar Glenn Weidner---11/02/2016 04:05:00 PM---Validated the following artifacts on Windows: systemml-0.11.0

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

-incubating-standalone.jar. --Glenn From: Sourav Mazumder <sourav.mazumde...@gmail.com> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 11/02/2016 02:34 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5) +1 On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Glenn Weidner

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

I see it's been removed as part of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926. I will validate the remaining artifacts on Windows. --Glenn From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 11/02/2016 02:22 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

The following artifact appears to be missing for RC5: systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.jar I believe it is still required for artifact validation. --Glenn From: Nakul Jindal To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 11/02/2016 11:43 AM Subject:

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

I've opened JIRA/PR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-1075) for review to address item [2] of https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg56892.html. Thanks, Glenn From: Glenn Weidner/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date

Re: rc3 source-release.zip artifact

In my opinion it can be removed. Thanks, Glenn From: Deron Eriksson To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/20/2016 01:36 PM Subject:rc3 source-release.zip artifact The 0.11.0 rc3 artifacts are located at:

Re: SystemML 0.11.0-incubating RC4 feedback

Can the systemml-0.11.0-incubating-source-release.zip be removed since there already is a src artifact systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip? Thanks, Glenn From: Luciano Resende To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/29/2016 07:25 PM Subject:

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4)

: Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org> Date: 10/27/2016 11:53 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC4) +1 -Arvind From: Glenn

Re: Running the bivar-stats example

ext", i.e., matrix market ijv representation (not csv). You can either provide such json meta data files or simply put a 'format="csv"' into the read statements in bivar-stats.dml. Regards, Matthias On 10/20/2016 2:44 AM, Glenn Weidner wrote: > Hi Sand

Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas

+1 for using both. Cheers, Glenn From: Deron Eriksson To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/25/2016 02:24 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE] SystemML New Logo Ideas +1 sounds great to me too. On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:44 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

nberry > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > On Oct 19, 2016, at 2:46 PM, Glenn Weidner <gweid...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > Yes - that is correct for test cases involving ID column for > DataFrameVectorFrameConversionTest, DataFrameVectorScriptTest, > MLCo

Re: Running the bivar-stats example

Hi Sandeep, Thank you for contacting the Apache SystemML community. Based on the following trace fragment: spark.SparkContext: Running Spark version 2.0.0 it looks like you're running against Spark 2.0 which is not officially supported with the current master code base. Can you retry with an

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

semanagement.html#check-list >>> >>> "2.1 Build is successful including automated tests. >>> The expanded source archive is expected to build and pass tests." >>> >>> Luciano, do you happen to know if some test failures are acceptable since >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3)

It's a nice-to-have but not a release blocker. Thanks, Glenn From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 10/18/2016 05:38 PM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC3) Glenn: Would you prefer to have

Re: Building a community around SystemML

I think we can just use 'starter' label which was available from drop-down list of labels. Thanks, Glenn From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 09/29/2016 07:22 AM Subject:Re: Building a community around SystemML +1 for marking

Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0

+1 Thanks, Glenn From: Berthold Reinwald/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 09/19/2016 09:52 PM Subject:Re: [DISCUSS] SystemML releases 0.11 and 1.0 +1. I'd even consider not fixing old MLContext releated issues. Regards, Berthold Reinwald IBM

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #338

f re-occurs. Thanks, Glenn From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 06/24/2016 10:51 AM Subject:Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #338 thanks for the fix Glenn. Regards, Matthias Glenn Weidner---06/24/2016 09:16:05

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: SystemML-DailyTest #338

I've directly pushed 1 commit of pom.xml to exclude new test data file (src/test/scripts/functions/jmlc/tfmtd_example2/column.names) from license check. Note I verified the rat-license check passed prior to merging the change: https://sparktc.ibmcloud.com/jenkins/job/SystemML-OnDemand/181/console

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2)

+1 From: Niketan Pansare/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org Date: 06/01/2016 06:56 AM Subject:Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.10.0-incubating (RC2) +1 > On Jun 1, 2016, at 6:10 AM, Acs S wrote: > > +1 > > From: Shirish