Re: Make more fields/methods of service classes protected

Hi Thiago, I didn't want to argue with you, just wanted to explain my opinion (and understand yours). I can accept the decision to stay with private methods althought I do not agree with you reasons ^^ I'll continue to discuss smaller changes (in behaviour) here. Kind regards, Michael.

Re: Accessing generic type information of bound parameters

No, there is no way to access the generic type, this information is lost during the compilation process. That's not actually correct. Lets consider the following class: public class MyClass { private ListFoo foos; public ListBar getBars() { ... } public void doStuffWithBaz()

Re: Accessing generic type information of bound parameters

Just having a quick poke through the code this could be fixed by adding the following methods to the public API. java.lang.reflect.Type PropertyConduit.getPropertyGenericType() java.lang.reflect.Type Binding.getBindingGenericType() java.lang.reflect.Type

Re: Accessing generic type information of bound parameters

Thanks Lance, you're correct of course. Michael, as this is still relevant to you, could you please update the Affects Version/s: field of your JIRA issue (TAP5-1213) accordingly? Am 13.05.2014 11:38, schrieb Lance Java: No, there is no way to access the generic type, this information is

Re: Accessing generic type information of bound parameters

Hi Michel, Am 12.05.2014 10:58, schrieb Michael Wyraz: I can access the type of a bound parameter using ComponentResources.getBoundType(parameterName). But for ListString it returns (of course) List.class. Is there a way to access the generic parameters of the bound type somehow? No, there is

Re: contributeMarkupRenderer missing JavaScriptSupport

Hi Thiago, thank you a lot. I changed it to configuration.add(ImportUIStack, importUIStack, after:JavaScriptSupport); This contribution comes from Tapestry's JavaScriptModule. The problem did not occur in the last hour - I guess it's solved with this change. Kind Regards, MIchael.

Re: Accessing generic type information of bound parameters

I have added a comment there concerning the behaviour for literal bindings. But I dont have permission to change the affected version. Thanks Lance, you're correct of course. Michael, as this is still relevant to you, could you please update the Affects Version/s: field of your JIRA issue

Re: Make more fields/methods of service classes protected

On Tue, 13 May 2014 05:25:22 -0300, Michael Wyraz michael.wy...@evermind.de wrote: Hi Thiago, Hi! I didn't want to argue with you, just wanted to explain my opinion (and understand yours). I can accept the decision to stay with private methods althought I do not agree with you reasons

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: tapestry-trunk-freestyle #1204

Any new insights on this one? The current master will still FTBFS on Java 5. Am 02.05.2014 18:18, schrieb Kalle Korhonen: On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Ulrich Stärk u...@spielviel.de wrote: I don't see the benefits in this. As I said earlier, Java 6 and 7 IMO don't provide enough benefits

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: tapestry-trunk-freestyle #1204

We could simply take a vote on this - case like this is exactly what the voting procedures at Apache were originally designed for. We'd need to vote on a clearly defined issue, like do we want to require Java 6 for T5.4 so we can upgrade dependencies that require Java 6, such as the newer closure