Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-09 Thread Gale Naylor
Yes, I think we can do the package.html file headers after the release. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:27 AM Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On 4 June 2016 at 17:30, Gale Naylor wrote: > > Thanks for the explanations, Stian. A vote-email script might not

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-06 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 4 June 2016 at 17:30, Gale Naylor wrote: > Thanks for the explanations, Stian. A vote-email script might not be a bad > idea! It certainly > seems to be a complicated thing to pull together. > > In response to Stian's email, I found some additional, related ASF >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-03 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 2 June 2016 at 19:50, Gale Naylor wrote: > I'm so sorry - I've been replying to the VOTE thread. > > I'll copy my comments here: > > -- > UP-FRONT CHECKS > -- > The MD5 checksums in the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-02 Thread Gale Naylor
Taverna Engine Build Sucess! Warnings Summary (see details below): (1) org.apache.taverna.workflowmodel.impl has a private reference (2) Unused Import-Package instructions: [org.springframework.orm.*] (3) Some problems were encountered while building the effective model for

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-02 Thread Gale Naylor
I'm so sorry - I've been replying to the VOTE thread. I'll copy my comments here: -- UP-FRONT CHECKS -- The MD5 checksums in the [VOTE] email are the same as the SHA1 checksums. I'm using the downloaded MD5 and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-01 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
Great! Yes, the long one sounds like trouble.. The README says: https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-engine/#building-on-windows > If you are building on Windows, ensure you unpack this source code to a > folder with a short path name lenght, e.g. C:\src - as Windows has a > limitation

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-01 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On 1 June 2016 at 12:05, Alan Williams wrote: >> How to review a release? https://s.apache.org/review-release > Do they need to be built in a specific order e.g. engine, common activities, > command line? Yes, perhaps we should add that to the wiki page. I added it to

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-01 Thread Alan Williams
On 01-Jun-16 12:27, Alan Williams wrote: Hello I get a failure: [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.19.1:test (default-test) on project dummy-taverna-plugin-activity: Execution default-test of goal

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-01 Thread Alan Williams
Hello I get a failure: [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.19.1:test (default-test) on project dummy-taverna-plugin-activity: Execution default-test of goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.19.1:t est failed: The forked VM

Re: [DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-01 Thread Alan Williams
On 01-Jun-16 12:03, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: Use this thread to discuss the release candidate proposed in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Z320lz77ps9xnov Please reply on the corresponding [VOTE] thread to place votes. Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers,

[DISCUSS] Release candidate 2 of Command-line Tool 3.1.0-incubating

2016-06-01 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
Use this thread to discuss the release candidate proposed in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/Z320lz77ps9xnov Please reply on the corresponding [VOTE] thread to place votes. Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please feel free to try out the release candidate