We haven't started to have a look at v2 yet. How would you like us to
contribute?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1295004405
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
@clangenb Hi, there are still some missing parts to merge version 2. I would be
grateful if you would help us.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1292951815
You are receiving this because you are
Alright, we will look into this soon! Thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1291540393
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
As far as I know, Baidu's team has already migrated Teaclave FaaS to SDK v2. So
I think `v2` will be stable soon in the near future.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1288537494
You are receiving
Once `v2` is stable, I can help you with the migration if you need it.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-128853
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
Yes, I must admit I wasn't aware of the v2.0.0 branch until recently, but it
sounds very tempting. :) We are going productive soonish; hence we can only
afford to migrate if it is stable. However, reduced maintenance cost is
definitely something we are looking forward to. :)
--
Reply to this
I will continue to maintain `v1.1.x `for a while, but as the `v2` version
stabilizes, I will consider pushing preview-v2.0.0 as master.
Migrating to v2 may take some effort. A major change in `v2` is that there is
no need to modify the third-party crate, which can save a lot of maintenance
Currently, we are working with `v1.1.x`, but at some point we will probably
migrate. Are you planning to maintain `v2` only at some point?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1288474599
You are
@clangenb Of course, I can share the upgrade process. Also, I wonder if you are
working on SDK v1.1.x or v2 now?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1288337706
You are receiving this because you are
Thanks a lot! Would you mind sharing the process on how you perform this
update? Then we could try helping out if you lack time the next time.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1288024614
You are
@volcano0dr Thank you for the update!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1287988430
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
@haerdib @hiroki-chen Sorry for the delay in updating rust-toolchain, because I
have no more free bandwidth recently.
I created the `v1.1.6-testing` branch, which supports `rust-nightly-2022-10-22`
and bump version to `1.1.6.` I also updated the `v2.0.0-preview `branch.
--
Reply to this email
@haerdib Hi there, I have forked teaclave-rust-sgx-sdk and tried to update it
to `nightly-2022-08-30`. (I am not sure whether this works for you, but this
suits my project well without `sgx_tstd`) The link is
[here](https://github.com/hiroki-chen/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/tree/v2.0.0-preview).
Is there any update on the rust-toolchain upgrade? We're also blocked because
of a new stabilized feature `bool::then_some` in rust 1.62 in June.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1276122336
You are
> @hiroki-chen Thank you for using teaclave-sgx-sdk. I plan to upgrade the Rust
> toolchain this month.
Glad to hear this! Thank you for your efforts.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@hiroki-chen Thank you for using teaclave-sgx-sdk. I plan to upgrade the Rust
toolchain this month.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1245062082
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to
Also found it necessary to upgrade to a newer version of toolchain because we
are using cargo extensions which were built with a newer nightly Rust toolchain
but the current SDK library is incompatible with newer toolchain (e.g.,
nightly-2022-08-25) :(
--
Reply to this email directly or view
This toolchain is still quite old, is there a blocker for never releases?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1164317986
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
I will upgrade the rust version for the SDK as soon as possible.I plan to
upgrade to `rust-nightly-2022-02-23`.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk/issues/386#issuecomment-1135311716
You are receiving this because you are
We're facing the same issue when upgrading to `nightly-2022-02-02`:
```zsh
error[E0432]: unresolved import `core::prelude::v1::llvm_asm`
-->
/home/.cargo/git/checkouts/incubator-teaclave-sgx-sdk-f208006cdf70a903/08264d6/sgx_tstd/src/prelude/v1.rs:49:64
|
49 | format_args_nl, include,
The current version is Rust nightly-2020-10-25 is very old, I faced some
problems compiling other libraries with rust sgx SDK project. Can you please
support the more recent rust version?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
21 matches
Mail list logo
