Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.15.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 Ran transaction related tests using the rc and they all passed. On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:10 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > Having the keys in the dist area and not in Tephra's github is fine. I > misunderstood which KEYS file you were referencing. Maybe the one in the > Tephra repo should be

Re: How to use Auto-Commit and transactions in Phoenix ??

When you set autoCommit to true on a connection a commit is a called after each statement is executed. If you want to commit a batch of rows from the client set auto commit to false and call commit on the connection when you are ready. On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Poorna Chandra

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.12.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 Ran Phoenix tests and verified there are no regressions. Thanks, Thomas On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > +1 > > - Checked build and test > - Checked signature and checksums > - Checked LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER > - Checked release tag and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 . Ran Phoenix tests and verified that there were no failures. On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Alan Gates wrote: > +1. Checked the signatures, checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER > files. Checked to be sure there were no binary files. Did a build with a >

[jira] [Updated] (TEPHRA-208) Compaction removes rows incorrectly for family deletes with column level conflict detection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas D'Silva updated TEPHRA-208: -- Attachment: TEPHRA-208.patch > Compaction removes rows incorrectly for family dele

[jira] [Created] (TEPHRA-208) Compaction removes rows incorrectly for family deletes with column level conflict detection

Thomas D'Silva created TEPHRA-208: - Summary: Compaction removes rows incorrectly for family deletes with column level conflict detection Key: TEPHRA-208 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEPHRA-208

Re: testing transactional deletes with compaction

this line after setting the tx snapshot dir: > > conf.setLong(TxConstants.Manager.CFG_TX_SNAPSHOT_INTERVAL, 2L); > > And the test passes now. The coprocessors use the snapshot data to clean up > data. > > Thanks, > Gokul > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Tho

testing transactional deletes with compaction

Hi, I am trying to debug a Phoenix test failure that deletes rows from a transactional table and then runs major compaction to remove the deleted rows. The rows are not getting removed after major compaction is run. I think it might be related to my test setup. I have attached a patch that