GitHub user jeking3 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/464
THRIFT-3081 consolidate client processing loop in most TServers
This pull request consolidates the client processing loop in the
TSimpleServer, TThreadedServer, and TThreadPoolServer. This ensures
Github user jeking3 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/464
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user ben-craig commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/433#discussion_r28189373
--- Diff: lib/cpp/src/thrift/server/TThreadPoolServer.cpp ---
@@ -146,9 +73,12 @@ void TThreadPoolServer::serve() {
shared_ptrTProcessor
Github user ben-craig commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/433#discussion_r28189526
--- Diff: lib/cpp/src/thrift/server/TConnectedClient.cpp ---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
GitHub user jeking3 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/433
THRIFT-3081 consolidate client processing loops
This pull request consolidates the client processing loops contained within
TSimpleServer, TThreadedServer, TThreadPoolServer that were all similar
Github user jeking3 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/428#issuecomment-91361228
Build failed though no fault of my own, so closing this and opening a new
one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jeking3 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/428
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jeking3 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/428#issuecomment-91284246
There was no conflict with master however I need to base THRIFT-3083 on top
of these changes so I needed to refresh it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
