[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Slava G updated TIKA-2676:
--
Summary: After switching to TIKA 1.18 from 1.17 started to get exception
(was: After switching to TIKA 1.18 fro
Olivier Schmitt created TIKA-2678:
-
Summary: Bug in TikaConfig / ServiceLoader
Key: TIKA-2678
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2678
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Bug
Comp
Yuriy Koval created TIKA-2677:
-
Summary: ConcurrentModificationException in
org.apache.tika.mime.MediaTypeRegistry.getAliases
Key: TIKA-2677
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2677
Project: T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518490#comment-16518490
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on TIKA-2667 at 6/20/18 7:04 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518490#comment-16518490
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on TIKA-2667 at 6/20/18 7:01 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518490#comment-16518490
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on TIKA-2667 at 6/20/18 7:00 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518490#comment-16518490
]
Uwe Schindler commented on TIKA-2667:
-
It's OK because it wont fail, but I dont unders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518427#comment-16518427
]
Slava G commented on TIKA-2676:
---
Hi Tim,
I would like to share more of stacktrace but here'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Slava G updated TIKA-2676:
--
Description:
I recently switched from TIKA 1.17 to TIKA 1.18 (I'm using tika to parse
emails).
And I started t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518406#comment-16518406
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2676:
---
Thank you for raising this. Can you share more of
Slava G created TIKA-2676:
-
Summary: After switching to TIKA 1.18 from !.17 started to get
exception
Key: TIKA-2676
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2676
Project: Tika
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518318#comment-16518318
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2667:
---
Before I release 1.4, [~thetaphi], would you be abl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518281#comment-16518281
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-2675:
--
sebastian-nagel opened a new pull request #24
Sebastian Nagel created TIKA-2675:
-
Summary: OpenDocumentParser should fail on invalid zip files
Key: TIKA-2675
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2675
Project: Tika
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16518162#comment-16518162
]
Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2674:
---
I'll update cxf to 3.2.4. I was hoping that the mos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Allison updated TIKA-2674:
--
Description:
So far...
mockito -> 2.19.0
bouncycastle -> 1.59
> Update some dependencies that are incom
Tim Allison created TIKA-2674:
-
Summary: Update some dependencies that are incompatible with Java
11
Key: TIKA-2674
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2674
Project: Tika
Issue Type:
I'd also be a bit concerned with ONLY compiling with Java 10. There are
some changes to how resources are accessed across module boundaries that
could break some existing functionality if folks decided to RUN with >
Java 9 using the module system. I covered some of these in my 2016
Apache Con tal
18 matches
Mail list logo