Re: security fixes for CVE-2019-10088 and CVE-2019-1009{3,4}

Hi Tim, > Y. You got CVE-2019-10088: > https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/426be73b9e7500fa3d441231fa4e473de34743f6 > > Two other commits you'll want are the following > > CVE-2019-10093: > https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/81c21ab0aac6b3e4102a1a8906c8c7eab6f96dae > > CVE-2019-10094: >

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2910) Text extraction using Tika command line and Tika server differs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905636#comment-16905636 ] Sergey Beryozkin commented on TIKA-2910: Hi [~talli...@apache.org], IMHO it should be fixed in the

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905509#comment-16905509 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-2922: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build tika-branch-1x #229 (See

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905503#comment-16905503 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-2922: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Tika-trunk #1694 (See

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905484#comment-16905484 ] Hudson commented on TIKA-2922: -- SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build tika-2.x-windows #448 (See

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2921) Tika discarding bodies of inline MIME elements in RFC822 email

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905482#comment-16905482 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2921: --- If you're willing to share the test file privately, please send to

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2921) Tika discarding bodies of inline MIME elements in RFC822 email

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905481#comment-16905481 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2921: --- Does your config file look like this: [^tika-2921.xml] ? Are you

[jira] [Updated] (TIKA-2921) Tika discarding bodies of inline MIME elements in RFC822 email

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Allison updated TIKA-2921: -- Attachment: tika-2921.xml > Tika discarding bodies of inline MIME elements in RFC822 email >

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2921) Tika discarding bodies of inline MIME elements in RFC822 email

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905468#comment-16905468 ] Joshua Turner commented on TIKA-2921: - My invocation uses the AutoDetectParser, excluding the

[jira] [Resolved] (TIKA-2918) Extracted text in wrong order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Allison resolved TIKA-2918. --- Resolution: Not A Problem I don't _think_ this is a problem with Tika. This is a known challenge

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2918) Extracted text in wrong order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905461#comment-16905461 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2918: --- Sorry, if sortbyposition doesn't work for you, you _might_ need to

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TIKA-2878) Update dependencies for 1.22

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905432#comment-16905432 ] Tim Allison edited comment on TIKA-2878 at 8/12/19 6:00 PM: Hi [~tmortagne],

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2878) Update dependencies for 1.22

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905432#comment-16905432 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2878: --- Hi [~tmortagne], we receive quite a few reports about out of date

[jira] [Resolved] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim Allison resolved TIKA-2922. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.23 Thank you, [~pascal.essiembre]! If you have local unit

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905423#comment-16905423 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-2922: -- tballison commented on issue #279: Fix for TIKA-2922

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905422#comment-16905422 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-2922: -- tballison commented on pull request #279: Fix for TIKA-2922

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2921) Tika discarding bodies of inline MIME elements in RFC822 email

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905419#comment-16905419 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2921: --- Sorry for my delay! I agree that I don't like

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2910) Text extraction using Tika command line and Tika server differs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905402#comment-16905402 ] Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2910: --- No need to wait for me on this one... The boilerpipe handler isn't

Re: security fixes for CVE-2019-10088 and CVE-2019-1009{3,4}

Y. You got CVE-2019-10088: https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/426be73b9e7500fa3d441231fa4e473de34743f6 Two other commits you'll want are the following CVE-2019-10093: https://github.com/apache/tika/commit/81c21ab0aac6b3e4102a1a8906c8c7eab6f96dae CVE-2019-10094:

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2921) Tika discarding bodies of inline MIME elements in RFC822 email

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16905303#comment-16905303 ] Joshua Turner commented on TIKA-2921: - Local testing with the following as a replacement for the first

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16904905#comment-16904905 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TIKA-2922: -- essiembre commented on pull request #279: Fix for TIKA-2922

[jira] [Created] (TIKA-2922) Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types

Pascal Essiembre created TIKA-2922: -- Summary: Regression issue with detecting .dotx and .xlam MS Office mime-types Key: TIKA-2922 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2922 Project: Tika