[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14628102#comment-14628102
 ] 

Tim Allison edited comment on TIKA-1588 at 7/15/15 2:13 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

Current version of reports attached comparing PDFBox 1.8.9 vs PDFBox 1.8.10 
against the PDFs in govdocs1.

Overall takeaway: no new exceptions, no fixed exceptions.

Without looking carefully at the files, it looks like there is a slight 
improvement in 005937.pdf and 722558.pdf.  It looks like there might be a very 
small regression in 167853.pdf, where 1 instance of {{respond}} has become 
{{respondæ}}

I realize now that I should try this again with the PDFBOX-2823 catch blocks 
removed...doh!


was (Author: talli...@mitre.org):
Current version of reports attached comparing PDFBox 1.8.9 vs PDFBox 1.8.10 
against the PDFs in govdocs1.

Overall takeaway: no new exceptions, no fixed exceptions.

Without looking carefully at the files, it looks like there is a slight 
improvement in 005937.pdf and 722558.pdf.  It looks like there might be a very 
small regression in 167853.pdf, where 1 instance of {{respond}} has become 
{{respondæ}}

> Upgrade to PDFBox 1.8.10 when available
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-1588
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1588
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: parser
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Assignee: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: reports_1_8_9_vs_1_8_10.zip
>
>
> Let's use this ticket to discuss/prepare for the release and integration of 
> PDFBox 1.8.10 when it is available.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to