d at: 2021-01-21T10:02:45-05:00
> [INFO]
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 7:29 PM Lewis John McGibbney
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim,
> > FWIW here's my review
> >
> > SIGS BOTH LOOK GOO
> FWIW here's my review
>
> SIGS BOTH LOOK GOOD
>
> gpg --verify tika-2.0.0-ALPHA-src.zip.asc tika-2.0.0-ALPHA-src.zip
> gpg: Signature made Wed Jan 13 15:26:10 2021 PST
> gpg:using RSA key 184454FAD8697760F3E00D2E4A51A45B944FFD51
> gpg: Good signature from
Hi Tim,
FWIW here's my review
SIGS BOTH LOOK GOOD
gpg --verify tika-2.0.0-ALPHA-src.zip.asc tika-2.0.0-ALPHA-src.zip
gpg: Signature made Wed Jan 13 15:26:10 2021 PST
gpg:using RSA key 184454FAD8697760F3E00D2E4A51A45B944FFD51
gpg: Good signature from "Tim Allison (ASF signin
and extracting metadata and
structured text content from various documents using existing parser
libraries.
Apache Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA contains a number of improvements and bug
fixes. Details can be found in the changes file:
https://www.apache.org/dist/tika/CHANGES-2.0.0-ALPHA.txt
Apache Tika
The Apache Tika project is pleased to announce the release of Apache
Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA. The release contents have been pushed out to the
main Apache release site and to the Maven Central sync, so the
releases should be available as soon as the mirrors get the syncs.
Apache Tika is a toolkit
gt; in the next few days. Thank you, all!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 1:46 AM Peter Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Here's my +1
>>>
>>> On 1 15 2021, at 2:44, Tilman Hausherr wrote:
>>> > +1
>&
The Apache Tika project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika
2.0.0-ALPHA. The release contents have been pushed out to the main Apache
release site and to the Maven Central sync, so the releases should be
available as soon as the mirrors get the syncs.
Apache Tika is a toolkit
ilman Hausherr wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Tilman
>> > Am 14.01.2021 um 02:19 schrieb Tim Allison:
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > A candidate for the Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA release is available at:
>> > > https://dist.apa
wrote:
> Here's my +1
>
> On 1 15 2021, at 2:44, Tilman Hausherr wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Tilman
> > Am 14.01.2021 um 02:19 schrieb Tim Allison:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > A candidate for the Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA release is ava
Here's my +1
On 1 15 2021, at 2:44, Tilman Hausherr wrote:
> +1
>
> Tilman
> Am 14.01.2021 um 02:19 schrieb Tim Allison:
> > All,
> >
> > A candidate for the Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA release is available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
> >
+1.
Good job!
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 8:44 PM Tilman Hausherr
wrote:
> +1
>
> Tilman
>
> Am 14.01.2021 um 02:19 schrieb Tim Allison:
> > All,
> >
> > A candidate for the Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA release is available at:
> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/
+1
Tilman
Am 14.01.2021 um 02:19 schrieb Tim Allison:
All,
A candidate for the Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/2.0.0-ALPHA-rc1/
The SHA
Built Successfully
Ran Tika Bundle Classic with latest version of Apache Felix (7.0.0)
+1
[X ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
- Bob
On 1/13/2021 7:19 PM, Tim Allison wrote:
All,
A candidate for the Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA release
All,
A candidate for the Tika 2.0.0-ALPHA release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tika/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://github.com/apache/tika/tree/2.0.0-ALPHA-rc1/
The SHA-512 checksum of the archive
And to reiterate, anything good in 2.0.0 is Bob's doing...I'll take credit
for the rest. :D
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:42 PM Tim Allison wrote:
> +1...on osgi, I broke it...I'll fix it this time...I hope. :D
>
> Will coordinate with Lewis McGibbney on tika-server refactoring and
> TIKA-3082.
>
+1...on osgi, I broke it...I'll fix it this time...I hope. :D
Will coordinate with Lewis McGibbney on tika-server refactoring and
TIKA-3082.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 12:03 PM Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2020, Tim Allison wrote:
> > Now that 1.25 is released, I'm going to work on
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020, Tim Allison wrote:
Now that 1.25 is released, I'm going to work on refactoring tika-eval and
tika-server shortly. Then add back in the osgi bundle. After that, shall
we go with 2.0.0-ALPHA?
Seems ok to me, assuming you're happy to do the work! :)
Thanks
Nick
All,
Now that 1.25 is released, I'm going to work on refactoring tika-eval and
tika-server shortly. Then add back in the osgi bundle. After that, shall
we go with 2.0.0-ALPHA?
In the meantime, I propose not adding new functionality to branch_1x. If
there are bug fixes or vulnerable
All,
Once we release 1.25, I propose working towards a release of 2.0.0-ALPHA
in December (open source hand waving). I'd like to modularize the
tika-server module a bit, and we have to put the osgi bundle back in. What
else would you consider to be the bare minimum to ship 2.0.0-ALPHA?
WDYT
19 matches
Mail list logo
