oh, sorry, I wasn't paying attention that well :)
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2007/4/12, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
In the future, since we're on java5, these types of constants should
probably by enums anyways.
enums? They are used as attribute names in request and session scope!
Anto
2007/4/12, David H. DeWolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
In the future, since we're on java5, these types of constants should
probably by enums anyways.
enums? They are used as attribute names in request and session scope!
Antonio
Agreed. I'm all for it.
In the future, since we're on java5, these types of constants should
probably by enums anyways.
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
Hi all!
When generating the Checkstyle report I noticed that it does not like
the "Constants" interface, because it contains
Hi all!
When generating the Checkstyle report I noticed that it does not like
the "Constants" interface, because it contains only constant fields
(and no methods).
So I was trying to remove it at all, since it contains only two constants:
ATTRIBUTE_CONTEXT_STACK is us
