[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353723#comment-15353723
]
pieter martin commented on TINKERPOP-1349:
--
Ok thanks
> RepeatUnrollStrategy should unroll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353703#comment-15353703
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1349:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/349
VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353670#comment-15353670
]
pieter martin edited comment on TINKERPOP-1349 at 6/28/16 8:41 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353670#comment-15353670
]
pieter martin commented on TINKERPOP-1349:
--
Ok, tx,
I reran the test but this time iterating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353408#comment-15353408
]
pieter martin commented on TINKERPOP-1349:
--
I did not know that the `RepeatStep` is a barrier
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/349
NOTE: This can not go into `tp31/` because `NoOpBarrierStep` is new to
TinkerPop 3.2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/349
TINKERPOP-1349: RepeatUnrollStrategy should unroll loops while maintaining
equivalent semantics.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349
`RepeatUnrollStrategy` is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353317#comment-15353317
]
pieter martin commented on TINKERPOP-1349:
--
Why are the barrier steps there?
I would have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kuppitz resolved TINKERPOP-1071.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2.1
> Enhance pre-processor output
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353314#comment-15353314
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1071:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15353231#comment-15353231
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1071:
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/348
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez updated TINKERPOP-1349:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.1.2-incubating)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1349:
-
Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
> RepeatUnrollStrategy should unroll
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1349:
-
Summary: RepeatUnrollStrategy should unroll loops while
maintaining equivalent semantics.
Key: TINKERPOP-1349
URL:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/348
This is most excellent - thanks!
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/346
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/346
Yes, I ran 'mvn clean install -DskipIntegrationTests=false -DincludeNeo4j'
and it passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1348.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> TraversalInterruptionTest success dependent on iteration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-786:
---
Component/s: (was: process)
documentation
Perhaps we need a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15352879#comment-15352879
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1071:
---
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a pull request:
GitHub user dkuppitz opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/348
TINKERPOP-1071 Enhance pre-processor output
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1071
To test the changes, I've added an invalid `foo + bar` line in one of the
code
23 matches
Mail list logo
