[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16225848#comment-16225848
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1801:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/734
@okram if all looks good to you after artem's changes you should be free to
merge this now:
All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i`
VOTE +1
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16225768#comment-16225768
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1821:
---
GitHub user okram opened a pull
GitHub user okram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/739
TINKERPOP-1821: Consistent behavior of self-referencing edges
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1821
Added test for self-edges and fixed a semantic issue in `Neo4jGraph`
rega
I guess there wouldn't be a problem with that, though having it the way it
works now was a nice check to ensure that the ScriptEngine was configured
properly. I guess that shouldn't be the focus on this body of tests though.
We should be more concerned that the elements of the Gremlin language
actu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1820:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Test)
> Include Python and .NET GLV tests on Trav
Ok great, I'll test a bit with the order changed.
Thanks,
Pieter
On 30/10/2017 18:01, Daniel Kuppitz wrote:
Ah, yea, I see what you mean. It's actually replaceStep() which is buggy,
not the strategy. The fix is easy, we just need to change the order of the
2 statements in replaceStep():
public
Ah, yea, I see what you mean. It's actually replaceStep() which is buggy,
not the strategy. The fix is easy, we just need to change the order of the
2 statements in replaceStep():
public static void replaceStep(final Step removeStep,
final Step insertStep, final Traversal.Admin traversal) {
f
stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1821:
---
Summary: Consistent behavior of self-referencing edges
Key: TINKERPOP-1821
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1821
Project: TinkerPop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16225084#comment-16225084
]
Chandran Anjur Narasimhan commented on TINKERPOP-1819:
--
That was
I am on the latest 3.3.1-SNAPSHOT, just pulled master again.
The actual traversals and results are correct. However after the
CountStrategy the VertexStep(OUT,edge) previousStep pointer
(AbstractStep.previousStep) is incorrect. I should be EmptyStep but
infact points to the newly inserted NotS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16225044#comment-16225044
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1820:
---
Github user jorgebay commented
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/738
> I see that you used the -q option. What happens if there is a failure in
native python tests? currently i don't see any output for those, i'm wondering
how that will fail when it does.
I don't see any issues. Which version are you talking about?
*gremlin> Gremlin.version()*
*==>3.2.7-SNAPSHOT*
gremlin> g = TinkerFactory.createModern().traversal()
==>graphtraversalsource[tinkergraph[vertices:6 edges:6], standard]
gremlin> g.V(1).repeat(out()).until(__.not(outE())).values('name')
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224914#comment-16224914
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1801:
---
Github user artem-aliev comment
Github user artem-aliev commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/734
I have fixed test failures.
TinkerPopComputer does not call ComputerPorgram.execute methods if spit
has no vertices.
For example: modern graph has 6 vertices but computer has 8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1819.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: stephen mallette
Fix Version/s: 3.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224829#comment-16224829
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1752:
---
Github user jorgebay commented
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/712
Yes it builds, this PR is good to go on my end!
Sorry I forgot to confirm on Friday :/
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224828#comment-16224828
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1752:
---
Github user spmallette commente
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/712
@jorgebay did the docker build ever finish successfully?
---
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/738
I see that you used the `-q` option. What happens if there is a failure in
native python tests? currently i don't see any output for those, i'm wondering
how that will fail when it does.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224661#comment-16224661
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1820:
---
Github user spmallette commente
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1820?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16224540#comment-16224540
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1820:
---
GitHub user jorgebay opened a p
GitHub user jorgebay opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/738
TINKERPOP-1820 Include Python and .NET GLVs on TravisCI
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1820
Run Python and .NET GLV tests on travis CI.
You can merge this pull request
Jorge Bay created TINKERPOP-1820:
Summary: Include Python and .NET GLV tests on TravisCI
Key: TINKERPOP-1820
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1820
Project: TinkerPop
Issue
Hi,
Whilst optimizing the NotStep I came across what looks to me like a bug
in TraversalHelper.replaceStep or perhaps rather in CountStrategy.
The test below shows the bug.
@Test
public void g_VX1X_repeatXoutX_untilXoutE_count_isX0XX_name() {
Graph graph = TinkerFactory.create
27 matches
Mail list logo
