Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

pluradj On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 4:07 PM Stephen Mallette wrote: > what's you're nuget account name? > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > > > I created a nuget account also. I believe I'm already associated with the > > TinkerPop on

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

what's you're nuget account name? On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 6:53 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > I created a nuget account also. I believe I'm already associated with the > TinkerPop on npm. > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > > > Validated

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

I created a nuget account also. I believe I'm already associated with the TinkerPop on npm. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Jason Plurad wrote: > Validated the binaries, did several manual tests with the Gremlin Server + > Gremlin Console, looked over the documentation. > >

Re: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.2.8 Release

Validated the binaries, did several manual tests with the Gremlin Server + Gremlin Console, looked over the documentation. VOTE: +1 On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote: > Thanks for catching that Jorge. I'm okay with the hack. I'll setup an > npms.js and nuget

Re: [DISCUSS] gpg check in validate-distribution.sh [Was: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.2 Release]

+1 Robert Dale On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > I think that approach makes sense. From my perspective i don't think this > needs a PR. maybe just wait until end of day friday to CTR it in? this > discussion basically serves as review imo. > > On

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1048) Vertex lookups by id are inconsistent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-1048: --- Assignee: (was: stephen mallette) > Vertex lookups by id are

Re: [DISCUSS] gpg check in validate-distribution.sh [Was: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.2 Release]

I think that approach makes sense. From my perspective i don't think this needs a PR. maybe just wait until end of day friday to CTR it in? this discussion basically serves as review imo. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Kuppitz wrote: > Here's what I came up with: >

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1903) Credentials DSL should use the Java annotation processor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1903: Fix Version/s: 3.3.3 deprecating for 3.3.3 - will remove the old method for

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1903) Credentials DSL should use the Java annotation processor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-1903: --- Assignee: stephen mallette > Credentials DSL should use the Java

[jira] [Updated] (TINKERPOP-1903) Credentials DSL should use the Java annotation processor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1903: Labels: deprecation (was: ) > Credentials DSL should use the Java annotation

Re: [DISCUSS] gpg check in validate-distribution.sh [Was: [VOTE] TinkerPop 3.3.2 Release]

Here's what I came up with: https://gist.github.com/dkuppitz/55d62c451a52d028825ea73803ae6320 This new approach verifies that the file was signed by anyone who's listed in the KEYS file (the one hosted on Apache servers, not the one in the repo) and that the signature matches the one listed on

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1927) Gherkin scenario expects list with duplicates, but receives g:Set

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426852#comment-16426852 ] stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1927: - The scenario doesn't really return a

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1927) Gherkin scenario expects list with duplicates, but receives g:Set

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-1927: --- Assignee: stephen mallette > Gherkin scenario expects list with

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1933) gremlin-python maximum recursion depth exceeded on large responses

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette reassigned TINKERPOP-1933: --- Assignee: David M. Brown > gremlin-python maximum recursion depth

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-1143) Remove deprecated TraversalSource.Builder and TraversalEngine.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426752#comment-16426752 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1143: --- GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request:

[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #830: TINKERPOP-1143 Moved TraversalEngine to gremlin...

GitHub user spmallette opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/830 TINKERPOP-1143 Moved TraversalEngine to gremlin-test https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1143 `TraversalEngine` and related infrastructure was deprecated way back on