Re: N-Tuples, Pointers, Data Model Interfaces, and Bytecode Instructions

Let me get back to you in a couple of days (post- Knowledge Graph Conference) with a more detailed reply, but I think we are more or less on the same page w.r.t. "pointers". With respect to sequences, in terms of type theory you can think of them as recursive types which make use of the disjoint

Re: N-Tuples, Pointers, Data Model Interfaces, and Bytecode Instructions

Hey Josh, > I am feeling the tuples... as long as they can be typed, e.g. > > myTuple.get(Integer) -- int-indexed tuples > myTuple.get(String) -- string-indexed tuples > In most programming languages, "tuples" are not lists, though they are typed > by a list of element types. E.g. in

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-2209) hasId is not converting properly when multiple values are passed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Hupman closed TINKERPOP-2209. --- Resolution: Won't Fix Actually ended up being a duplicate of issue 1048 after further

N-Tuples, Pointers, Data Model Interfaces, and Bytecode Instructions

Hi, I spent this afternoon playing with n-tuples, pointers, data model interfaces, and bytecode instructions. https://gist.github.com/okram/25d50724da89452853a3f4fa894bcbe8 *** Kuppitz: They are tuples :). A Map extends

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2209) hasId is not converting properly when multiple values are passed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16834193#comment-16834193 ] Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-2209: --- This is a known issue: 

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2209) hasId is not converting properly when multiple values are passed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16834145#comment-16834145 ] Chris Hupman commented on TINKERPOP-2209: - Thanks for the info Daniel. I have a better

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2209) hasId is not converting properly when multiple values are passed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16834103#comment-16834103 ] Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-2209: --- This is the expected behavior. {{hasId}}

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-2209) hasId is not converting properly when multiple values are passed

Chris Hupman created TINKERPOP-2209: --- Summary: hasId is not converting properly when multiple values are passed Key: TINKERPOP-2209 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2209

A collection of examples that map a query language query to provider bytecode.

Hello, I’m experimenting with moving between X query language and Y bytecode via Universal Bytecode. The general (and very difficult) goal of TP4 is to be able to execute queries (from any known query language) against any database (regardless of underlying data model) using any processing

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2143) JavaScript GLV: Support browsers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16833751#comment-16833751 ] Dominik Franek commented on TINKERPOP-2143: --- [~moayad86] Have you tried the code I've

[jira] [Closed] (TINKERPOP-2204) Client receives no response on failed request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-2204. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: stephen mallette Fix Version/s: 3.4.2

[jira] [Commented] (TINKERPOP-2204) Client receives no response on failed request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16833725#comment-16833725 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2204: --- spmallette commented on pull request #1102:

Re: The Fundamental Structure Instructions Already Exist! (w/ RDBMS Example)

Hey Josh, > One more thing is needed: disjoint unions. I described these in my email on > algebraic property graphs. They are the "plus" operator to complement the > "times" operator in our type algebra. A disjoint union type is just like a > tuple type, but instead of having values for field a