[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephen Mallette updated TINKERPOP-2392:
Component/s: (was: python)
(was: javascript)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephen Mallette closed TINKERPOP-2392.
---
Fix Version/s: 3.4.9
3.5.0
Resolution: Done
not sure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephen Mallette updated TINKERPOP-2392:
Component/s: python
dotnet
> Improve module level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17189306#comment-17189306
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2392:
---
spmallette merged pull request #1321:
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stephen Mallette closed TINKERPOP-2405.
---
Fix Version/s: 3.4.9
3.5.0
Resolution: Fixed
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17189290#comment-17189290
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2405:
---
spmallette merged pull request #1316:
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17189287#comment-17189287
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2392:
---
spmallette commented on a change in pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17189285#comment-17189285
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2392:
---
jorgebay commented on a change in pull request
Here's the PR for withEmbedded(Graph)
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1322
I opted to leave this method out of GLVs since there is no real "embedded
graph" to provide there. So, a bit inconsistent, but it seems better than
creating the idea that it's possible to do embedded connections
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17189271#comment-17189271
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-2413:
---
spmallette opened a new pull request #1322:
It's interesting - we never actually went forward promoting withGraph() at
all. I seem to recall that we might have expected to promote it in full in
3.5.0, but we've been delayed a bit in that version's development so it's
been forgotten. :/ Personally, i don't see a problem with changing the
I think naming it withEmbedded() can help users understand the difference
between the two modes (I remember it took me a while to grasp it).
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:51 PM Kelvin Lawrence
wrote:
> I think this makes good sense and improves the naming consistency.
>
> Cheers,
> Kelvin
>
> On
12 matches
Mail list logo