On 2019/04/24 12:19:54, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I think it would be better to either expose Flowable on the API (or Flow if
> > you don't want to be tied in to RxJava)
>
> We definitely don’t want to expose anything “provider specific.” Especially
> at the Processor
On 2019/04/23 13:07:09, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Stephen and Bryn were looking over my RxJava implementation the other day and
> Bryn, with his British accent, was like [I paraphrase]:
>
> “Whoa dawg! Bro should like totally not be blocking to fill an
> iterator. Gnar gnar
On 2018/10/22 18:21:13, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2075
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 1:37 PM Stephen Mallette
> wrote:
>
> > > I'd like to propose 2a. Update Gremlin Server and TinkerGraph to behave
> > in the desired way, this would set the
Hi,
I recently saw the new OptionsStrategy feature added in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-2053, and was wondering it it
would be possible to add dedicated support for this at the traversal level.
Using a strategy is fine, and I can see that it fits well with the existing
On 2018/10/03 17:06:16, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> We currently have this situation where users get a fair bit of
> inconsistency around the contents of graph elements depending on a matrix
> of different usage options that we offer - here's just a few "options" as
> examples:
>
> 1. Use
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/812
+1 (Non binding)
---
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/755
This looks great. +1 (non binding)
---
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/748
Would a cap step with no side effect keys be a better fit here rather than
filter?
It would remove the need for a 'false' traversal.
---
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/641
Can we rename the PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/590
I've reworked for tp31. Also I check null values on array parameters.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user BrynCooke opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/590
TINKERPOP-1664 StarVertexProperty will check meta-properties are valid.
StarVertexProperty will check meta-properties are valid.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/567
1. ManagedConcurrentValueMap is not a map. I don't really know why we use
this. but computeIfAbsent is not present on this class.
2. Guava LoadingCache and MoreExecutors.directExecutor
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/567
I like the idea of using a Future.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user BrynCooke opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/567
TINKERPOP-1644 Improve script compilation syncronisation
Script compilation is synchronised.
Script compilation times are placed in to logs.
Failed scripts will not be recompiled
Github user BrynCooke closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
Great thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
Retargeting at tp32.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
Yes, that's it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
Exactly. It's currently a huge pain to figure out where things have gone
wrong. Without this patch I have to divide and conquer my code every time I hit
a FastNoSuchElementException
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
@dkuppitz I've updated the changelog and upgrade docs. Please could you
take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
The lambda traversal will throw a regular NoSuchElementException is it is
unparented.
However, won't this will only happen once? The exception will bubble up and
out of the top level
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
@okram I have changed the approach entirely to avoid adding an extra
strategy.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user BrynCooke opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/470
TINKERPOP-887 ExceptionHandlerStrategy
Added exception handler strategy to convert FastNoSuchElementExceptions in
to regular NoSuchElementExceptions when exiting a traversal.
You can merge
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/355
Also the conversion of the collection to an array is dangerous. Who knows
what the collection is actually backed by? It should use an iterator and get
the first element if it exists
GitHub user BrynCooke opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/355
TINKERPOP-1355 Design HasContainer for extension
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/BrynCooke/incubator-tinkerpop TINKERPOP
Github user BrynCooke commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/347
@dkuppitz Yes you are right, I've tweaked the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user BrynCooke opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/347
Force startedIterating before sleep
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/BrynCooke/incubator-tinkerpop TINKERPOP-1348
28 matches
Mail list logo
