I don't know how it would work, but I've been imagining something that uses
cucumber somehow. Cypher uses it for it's language agnostic testing in
their Technology Compatibility Kit:
https://github.com/opencypher/openCypher/tree/master/tck
Again, not sure how cucumber (or whatever we use) would b
Hi,
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "The method for testing GLVs is
not language agnostic"?
It would be nice to have a reusable test suite to make a GLV pass through
but it would involve a communication mechanism between 2 different runtimes
(ie: jvm and dotnet) that could be very hard t
So i took a few minutes to deal with those GLV pull requests that have been
hanging out there. I did things a little differently than I had described
in this thread. i created TINKERPOP-1489 branch for js work and
TINKERPOP-1552 for c# work. both branches extend from tp32-glv. in this
way, the GLVs
Not sure if you remember all the discussions we've had (would have to dig
through the mailing list to find them), but GLVs are meant to be TinkerPop
maintained. There were a number of reasons for this, but basically GLVs are
too important to TinkerPop's spread and adoption to be left to
third-parti
I think there's less risk and work having GLVs linked and listed on the
Query Languages [Providers] pages (enhancement: specify which are developed
by Apache TinkerPop or third-party/community). The risk being that the
maintainer disappears and no one else has the skill/time to move it
forward. Se
I'm not sure if it's been generally noticed, but Florian Hockmann recently
produced:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/600
which gives TinkerPop the start of a .NET based GLV. We also have a long
standing PR for the start of a JS GLV with:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/450
In
