Re: [DISCUSS] Transition to Semantic Versioning

2023-10-13 Thread Ken Hu
Please let me know your thoughts on this. > > Thanks, > > Cole > > From: Fred Eisele > Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 2:56 PM > To: dev@tinkerpop.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Transition to Semantic Versioning > What about CalVer? https://calver.org/ >

Re: [DISCUSS] Transition to Semantic Versioning

2023-10-12 Thread Cole Greer
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Transition to Semantic Versioning What about CalVer? https://calver.org/ There have been TinkerPop versions in the past which were quite different 1, 2, 3. I would expect a version 4 (as some proposals suggested). It seems that this major version number is part of the product

Re: [DISCUSS] Transition to Semantic Versioning

2023-09-27 Thread Fred Eisele
What about CalVer? https://calver.org/ There have been TinkerPop versions in the past which were quite different 1, 2, 3. I would expect a version 4 (as some proposals suggested). It seems that this major version number is part of the product name more than just a version. On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at

[DISCUSS] Transition to Semantic Versioning

2023-09-27 Thread Cole Greer
Hi everyone, I think now is a good time to start thinking about 3.7.x development from master into 3.7-dev and to setup master to take breaking changes for the next major release. I opted to delay this after the last release to temporarily save some of the admin burden of 4 active branches. I