Thus far we've forced python users to be explicit and think in java terms, thus:
```python
g.V().has('age', long(851401972585122)).count()
```
but I suppose it's better if this were just handled automatically as it might
yield less confusion and be more pythonic. The test you added here is fine but
please add a test here:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.3-dev/gremlin-python/src/main/jython/tests/structure/io/test_graphsonV2d0.py#L306
and here:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/blob/3.3-dev/gremlin-python/src/main/jython/tests/structure/io/test_graphsonV3d0.py#L357
to more directly test GraphSON. Please do not remove the existing tests that
use the old `long()` syntax as I think it's still worth testing that since it's
something we will continue to support. Just add new assertions for your new
logic. I guess it wouldn't hurt to add tests to cover both positive and
negative values in your range.
[ Full content available at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/1280 ]
This message was relayed via gitbox.apache.org for dev@tinkerpop.apache.org
