[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #502: Tweaks for broad JDK8 support

2016-11-19 Thread joshsh
Github user joshsh commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/502 Alrighty, then. I will just cherry-pick the second of those commits. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #502: Tweaks for broad JDK8 support

2016-11-19 Thread spmallette
Github user spmallette commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/502 There was a bug in the JDK before 40 - it definitely shouldn't be used. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #502: Tweaks for broad JDK8 support

2016-11-19 Thread robertdale
Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/502 I like the refactoring. But why go backwards in java version? Is this for source or target compatibility? If it's source, I can't imagine as a dev you don't have the ability to upgrade to so