[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #683: TINKERPOP-1736 Sack step evaluated by groovy interpret...

2017-07-31 Thread twilmes
Github user twilmes commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/683 VOTE: +1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #683: TINKERPOP-1736 Sack step evaluated by groovy interpret...

2017-07-31 Thread okram
Github user okram commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/683 VOTE +1 (got rid of BigDecimal typing -- good). --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this