[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #715: change behaviour of repeat step to be depth first sear...

2017-10-31 Thread robertdale
Github user robertdale commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715 @mpollmeier Making it official. Please update the title to start with `TINKERPOP-1822` ---

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #715: change behaviour of repeat step to be depth first sear...

2017-09-17 Thread mpollmeier
Github user mpollmeier commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715 `emit` modifies the behaviour of the repeat traversal, and I am unsure why that is. Let me explain what I know and hopefully you or someone else can fill the blanks. Let's take my

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #715: change behaviour of repeat step to be depth first sear...

2017-09-15 Thread dkuppitz
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715 It's not. It can't be unrolled, since I'm using emit(). ---

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #715: change behaviour of repeat step to be depth first sear...

2017-09-15 Thread mpollmeier
Github user mpollmeier commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715 That's likely because of the RepeatUnrollStrategy, which kicks in when there's a foreseeable number of iterations. Needs to be changed as well I guess. -Original Message-

[GitHub] tinkerpop issue #715: change behaviour of repeat step to be depth first sear...

2017-09-15 Thread dkuppitz
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/715 Using the modern graph: ``` gremlin> g.V().emit().repeat(both()).times(3).limit(15).path() ==>[v[1]] ==>[v[1],v[3]] ==>[v[1],v[2]] ==>[v[1],v[4]]