[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220101#comment-16220101
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1752:
---
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
Github user jorgebay commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/712
VOTE +1
---
Hugo Arts created TINKERPOP-1811:
Summary: Improve error reporting for serialization errors between
gremlin-python and gremlin-server
Key: TINKERPOP-1811
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1811
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/736
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220295#comment-16220295
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1791:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1791.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: stephen mallette
Fix Version/s: 3.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1798.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3.1
3.2.7
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220297#comment-16220297
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1798:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/737
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220393#comment-16220393
]
Bill Woo edited comment on TINKERPOP-1816 at 10/26/17 1:01 PM:
---
Without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220435#comment-16220435
]
Jorge Bay commented on TINKERPOP-1816:
--
Can you specify which areas are not covered in the docs:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1816:
Summary: Consider improvements to the .NET documentation (was: the .NET
port
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220393#comment-16220393
]
Bill Woo commented on TINKERPOP-1816:
-
Without a certain minimal level of documentation, there is
Bryn Cooke created TINKERPOP-1812:
-
Summary: ProfileTest assumes that graph implementations will not
add their own steps
Key: TINKERPOP-1812
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1812
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1806:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Task)
> Consistently use Gremlin.Net instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220424#comment-16220424
]
stephen mallette commented on TINKERPOP-1816:
-
> Without a certain minimal level of
Bryn Cooke created TINKERPOP-1813:
-
Summary: Subgraph strategy requires the graph API
Key: TINKERPOP-1813
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1813
Project: TinkerPop
Issue
I can't help thinking that perhaps non-JVM languages need to leverage
bytecode to make traversal building easier. We already have an established
pattern for converting bytecode into Traversals and while it is different
for each language, it's generally governed by the Translator interface.
Note
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1816:
Affects Version/s: 3.2.6
> the .NET port has no useful documentation
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1816:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> the .NET port has no useful documentation
Maybe outE() and inE() should only return non-self-referencing edges. Then
there should be a new step called selfE(). And every time it's called, it
posts a picture of Gremlin holding that edge to Facebook. :-)
Hmm.. it seems like you made the engineering case. What's the user
perspective? I
Bill Woo created TINKERPOP-1816:
---
Summary: the .NET port has no useful documentation
Key: TINKERPOP-1816
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816
Project: TinkerPop
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Woo updated TINKERPOP-1816:
Description:
Without at least one complete code sample, you are wasting potential users;
time.
Bryn Cooke created TINKERPOP-1814:
-
Summary: Some process tests require the graph API
Key: TINKERPOP-1814
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1814
Project: TinkerPop
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1814:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Test)
> Some process tests require the graph API
Is there some difference between what you are proposing and:
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#drop-step
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:18 PM, pieter gmail
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if we can add a remove step. Currently to remove elements
> I
I racked my brain on it a bit a while back without any good fixit's
really a TinkerGraph test. I probably should just migrate them over there
and stop pressing them down on other providers.
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:31 PM, pieter gmail
wrote:
> In Sqlg many profile
Hi,
I was wondering if we can add a remove step. Currently to remove
elements I iterate the traversal and call remove on each element. Adding
a remove step will make it possible to optimize removals.
Its probably less useful for Neo4j and TinkerGraph, not sure about Janus
but for Sqlg,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1812:
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Test)
> ProfileTest assumes that graph
Ha, there it is already. Sorry did not know about that one. A rtfm moment.
Thanks
Pieter
On 26/10/2017 20:21, Stephen Mallette wrote:
Is there some difference between what you are proposing and:
http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/current/reference/#drop-step
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:18 PM,
Yes.
We should have only a primitive ProfileTest that ensures that a
TraversalMetrics object is returned and that is it.
Marko.
> On Oct 26, 2017, at 12:35 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote:
>
> I racked my brain on it a bit a while back without any good fixit's
> really
In Sqlg many profile tests are ignored because of this. Including steps
being removed.
Back in the day no-one including myself had any interest in fixing it.
Its not trivial by all accounts.
Cheers
Pieter
On 26/10/2017 13:21, Bryn Cooke (JIRA) wrote:
Bryn Cooke created TINKERPOP-1812:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16220590#comment-16220590
]
Bill Woo commented on TINKERPOP-1816:
-
With the same time and energy you just spent constructing a
Bryn Cooke created TINKERPOP-1815:
-
Summary: Graph io requires the graph API
Key: TINKERPOP-1815
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1815
Project: TinkerPop
Issue Type:
I see that for most languages using bytecode to native language translator
would be the easiest solution. In the case of the JavaScript GLV, it would
be fairly straightforward to implement (and I plan to do so!).
In the case of C#, being more strict regarding typing than java, it would
be an
35 matches
Mail list logo