Re: [DISCUSS] 3.1.x code line

It does for me too, +1. --Ted On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > +1. It does to me. > Hadrian > > > On 07/13/2016 04:29 PM, Stephen Mallette wrote: > >> Since we don't really follow semantic versioning for releases, I thought >> we >> should discuss

ApacheCon Europe call for papers open

Dear Apache Enthusiast, As you are no doubt already aware, we will be holding ApacheCon in Seville, Spain, the week of November 14th, 2016. The call for papers (CFP) for this event is now open, and will remain open until September 9th. The event is divided into two parts, each with its own CFP.

Re: [TinkerPop] Traversal ByteCode and Translators (The TINKERPOP-1278 Saga)

Here are the ProcessStandardTestSuite examples in GraphSON Bytecode: https://gist.github.com/okram/3c7a5f8047d10c0bfc29d55f8c229c54 Marko. http://markorodriguez.com > On Jul 14, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Marko Rodriguez

Re: [TinkerPop] Traversal ByteCode and Translators (The TINKERPOP-1278 Saga)

Hi, Check this out. Yesterday, I added GraphSONSerializers/Deserializers for Bytecode. This means that we are able to translate Bytecode to JSON. In order to test to make sure my serializers/deserializers are good, I created a Translator called GraphSONTranslator that is only used in our test

Re: [DISCUSS] New IO format for GLVs/Gremlin Server

On 2016-07-13 13:17 (+0100), Robert Dale wrote: > Marko, I agree that empty object properties should not be represented. > I think if you saw that in an example then it was probably for > demonstration purposes. > > Kevin, can you expand on this comment: > > > the format