Ok, thanks.
Its tricky as it messes with the laziness and visibility of the queries.
Can really think of a solution though.
Cheers
Pieter
On 21/01/2017 21:14, Daniel Kuppitz wrote:
> Hi Pieter,
>
> forEachRemaining iterates over the result and hence I would expect the
> result to be 2.
Hi Pieter,
forEachRemaining iterates over the result and hence I would expect the
result to be 2. Otherwise you would / should end up with an endless loop.
However, the same behavior is seen when you replace forEachRemaining with a
sideEffect lambda step. Not sure what the expected behavior is /
Hi,
I need to clarify the expected semantics of gremlin's lazy iteration
semantics.
The following gremlin is what highlighted it.
```
@Test
public void testLazy() {
final TinkerGraph graph = TinkerGraph.open();
final Vertex a1 = graph.addVertex(T.label, "A");
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette closed TINKERPOP-1611.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Thanks james but already done for TinkerPop 3.1.x and up
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15832946#comment-15832946
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1605:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/537
Done. We already use `validate-distribution.sh` to test script evaluations,
so it was easy to another test.
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/537
Oh, that's a good idea! I will add that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15832937#comment-15832937
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1605:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15832934#comment-15832934
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1605:
---
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/537
Isn't there a distribution verification that does tests? I know it's
post-build, but that's better than nothing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15832932#comment-15832932
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1605:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Kuppitz closed TINKERPOP-1605.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2.4
> gremlin-console 3.2.3 -e can no
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/537
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15832931#comment-15832931
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1605:
---
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/537
Same here. I can't think of a way to test `gremlin.sh`. The script requires
that the project was built, but tests can be run without building the project
upfront. Going to merge this PR for now.
15 matches
Mail list logo
