Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
All tests pass with `docker/build.sh -t -n -i`
VOTE +1
---
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
All better now. Verified new index and cluster property settings.
VOTE +1 again
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
I did a rebase to master and messed it up.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
`docker/build.sh -i -t -n` SUCCESS
VOTE +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jexp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
@robertdale I did the split of the project into two modules which have been
published separately, please have a look.
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
@spmallette I think the right way to do it is for @jexp to pull out that
neo4j/gremlin procedure into its own, separate module. That's what creates the
cyclic dependency on tinkerpop. Then a
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
@robertdale can you offer your thoughts on how you see this working? I
don't think we want to merge a SNAPSHOT to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
Pulled in @jexp latest changes. This depends on SNAPSHOT versions both
ways (cyclic dependencies) so we'll need to update both sides to release
versions at release time.
`mvn clean
Github user jexp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
I pushed a branch here:
https://github.com/neo4j-contrib/neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl/tree/gremlin-330
and updated the other branch here:
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
3.3.0 is still SNAPSHOT only. it won't release for another couple of weeks
or so i imagine.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jexp commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
I didn't see a released 3.3.0 version of tp3 on maven central, that's why I
used 3.2.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
Hmm... so just to reiterate and be super clear the desire is to have Neo4j
3.2.2 on TinkerPop 3.3.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
The original request was to upgrade on TinkerPop 3.3 on
https://github.com/neo4j-contrib/neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl/issues/6 . I think
with Neo4j and TinkerPop being on similar 3.x.y version
Github user spmallette commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
confused - does this mean this PR should target 3.2.2? or is there a
neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl 0.6-3.3.0 to use?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/680
@spmallette Sorry I haven't commented earlier. I don't think this is right.
This PR is using neo4j-tinkerpop-api-impl 0.6-3.2.2 which uses gremlin 3.2.5.
However, master is gremlin
15 matches
Mail list logo
