[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #629: TINKERPOP-1552: Clean-up Gremlin-DotNet project...
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/629 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #629: TINKERPOP-1552: Clean-up Gremlin-DotNet project...
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/629#discussion_r122460079 --- Diff: gremlin-dotnet/glv/AnonymousTraversal.template --- @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ using Gremlin.Net.Structure; // THIS IS A GENERATED FILE - DO NOT MODIFY THIS FILE DIRECTLY - see pom.xml namespace Gremlin.Net.Process.Traversal { +#pragma warning disable 1591 --- End diff -- Done. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #629: TINKERPOP-1552: Clean-up Gremlin-DotNet project...
Github user FlorianHockmann commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/629#discussion_r122388282 --- Diff: gremlin-dotnet/glv/AnonymousTraversal.template --- @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ using Gremlin.Net.Structure; // THIS IS A GENERATED FILE - DO NOT MODIFY THIS FILE DIRECTLY - see pom.xml namespace Gremlin.Net.Process.Traversal { +#pragma warning disable 1591 --- End diff -- Looks like you're right. I thought that it would be necessary to also document all function arguments and return values, but it seems to be enough to have a `summary` for each element. This also applies to the `GraphTraversal` class. I'll update the pull request to remove the `pragmas` for both classes. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #629: TINKERPOP-1552: Clean-up Gremlin-DotNet project...
Github user jorgebay commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/629#discussion_r122383928 --- Diff: gremlin-dotnet/glv/AnonymousTraversal.template --- @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ using Gremlin.Net.Structure; // THIS IS A GENERATED FILE - DO NOT MODIFY THIS FILE DIRECTLY - see pom.xml namespace Gremlin.Net.Process.Traversal { +#pragma warning disable 1591 --- End diff -- Is this needed for this source file, all methods are being generated with docs. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] tinkerpop pull request #629: TINKERPOP-1552: Clean-up Gremlin-DotNet project...
GitHub user FlorianHockmann opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/629 TINKERPOP-1552: Clean-up Gremlin-DotNet project files https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1552 This removes some obsolete configuration options and improves the package meta information. Especially the description was extended to reflect the current state of Gremlin-DotNet. This explanation can be removed as soon as the old Gremlin.Net driver is obsolete (probably when a first release version of Gremlin-DotNet is released). The version is now 3.2.5-beta1. I also enabled the generation of an XML document containing the documentation comments which will be displayed to the user with IntelliSense. The warning about missing comments had to be disabled for some files as we currently just don't have comments for those. I think that's ok for now, but we should try to find a way to create meaningful comments where they are missing right now for the first official (non-beta) release. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/FlorianHockmann/tinkerpop gremlin-dotnet-packagemetadata Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/629.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #629 commit 02955d4df4c1e16ec3fcd6977979badc44a8b91e Author: Florian HockmannDate: 2017-06-15T16:25:56Z Clean-up Gremlin-DotNet project files This removes some obsolete configuration options and improves the package meta information. Especially the description was extended to reflect the current state of Gremlin-DotNet. This explanation can be removed as soon as the old Gremlin.Net driver is obsolete (probably when a first release version of Gremlin-DotNet is released). The version is now 3.2.5-beta1. commit ab55e95de63efc6d670a7af50901f9c48a33501d Author: Florian Hockmann Date: 2017-06-15T17:00:38Z Let Gremlin-DotNet include the documentation comments Every build now generates an XML document containing the documentation comments which will be displayed to the user with IntelliSense. The warning about missing comments had to be disabled for some files as we currently just don't have comments for those. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---