Github user robertdale commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/699
VOTE +1
---
Github user okram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/699
I'm scared -- VOTE +1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/699
`docker/build.sh -t -n -i` still succeeds after recent changes.
Still VOTE: +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dkuppitz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tinkerpop/pull/699
I can rename them or just make them package private. I'd prefer the latter.
In fact that's what I've at first... I changed it to prevent your "please make
that final protected" comment ;)
---
