This was a very helpful bit of work for windows users - thanks for that. I
don't think we will merge it for the 3.1.1-incubating release as we've
frozen that release at this point and we still have discussion to deal with
about appveyor, but it will eventually be merged to the tp31 branch for
3.1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1106:
Description:
Because the last message in a result is sent before commit as the t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128159#comment-15128159
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1041:
---
Github user steveloughran comme
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/207#discussion_r51560858
--- Diff: appveyor.yml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+version: '{build}'
+
+environment:
+ matrix:
+- JAVA_HOME: C:\Program
I just made some adjustments to source NOTICE files in tp31. The change
came as a result of the bump in groovy version - they had new NOTICE files
themselves after releasing under Apache. Ideally, I think it's best if we
can try to catch these things earlier (like when the version bump
occurred).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
stephen mallette updated TINKERPOP-1114:
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.0.2-incubating)
3.1.0-incub
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128230#comment-15128230
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-968:
--
I'm fine with the addition of an {
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1115:
-
Summary: Add map(traversal), flatMap(traversal),
filter(traversal), ?? to Reference Docs
Key: TINKERPOP-1115
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128241#comment-15128241
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-968:
--
Yea. My one concern is tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128278#comment-15128278
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-968:
--
Nah, that's okay IMO. In the end,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128301#comment-15128301
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-968:
--
Thats a good argument. Oka
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128324#comment-15128324
]
Daniel Kuppitz commented on TINKERPOP-968:
--
The shouldn't be an {{OptionalStep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128356#comment-15128356
]
pieter martin commented on TINKERPOP-968:
-
Ok, good stuff, I'll give it a bash.
Hi guys,
Here are a few things I've been thinking about for 3.1.2 and 3.2.
TinkerPop 3.1.2
* TinkerPop-1016 - finish first set of JMH benchmarks
* TinkerPop-965 - optimize strategy application
* Study Ferma/TinkerPop benchmark, see where the performance deltas are
coming from, and create tickets a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128401#comment-15128401
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-968:
--
Yep. My bad. Also, [~piete
The report has been posted to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2016
.
--Ted
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote:
> Cool, if there is any other input, just let me know. Otherwise, I'll go
> ahead and post it tomorrow morning to the incubator wiki.
>
> Thanks,
> Ted
>
> On
Cool. Reads smooth and is accurate. Thanks Ted!
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:37 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote:
> The report has been posted to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2016
> .
>
> --Ted
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Ted Wilmes wrote:
>
>> Cool, if t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128450#comment-15128450
]
Marko A. Rodriguez commented on TINKERPOP-962:
--
So in the TINKERPOP-962 br
Hello Ted,
Dude, all of those items you list are so crucial to my efforts. If that
infrastructure existed, I would have so much more confidence in each release.
> * TinkerPop-965 - optimize strategy application
This will be huge. I have a ticket around somewhere about getting rid of the
Traver
Hi,
In OLAP (GraphComputer), we have the enums ResultGraph and Persist.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/blob/master/gremlin-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tinkerpop/gremlin/process/computer/GraphComputer.java#L33-L57
My original intention with ResultGraph was that if you di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128848#comment-15128848
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1041:
---
Github user velo commented on a
Github user velo commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/207#discussion_r51620901
--- Diff: appveyor.yml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+version: '{build}'
+
+environment:
+ matrix:
+- JAVA_HOME: C:\Program Files\Jav
GitHub user leifurhauks opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/208
TinkerFactory.createClassic -> createModern
fixed reference to TinkerFactory.createClassic that should refer instead to
TinkerFactory.createModern, which creates the version of Tink
Marko A. Rodriguez created TINKERPOP-1116:
-
Summary: Some anonymous traversal steps can be hard typed.
Key: TINKERPOP-1116
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1116
Project: Tin
Github user spmallette commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/208#issuecomment-178808940
I think this was meant to be `createClassic()` - note the use of float
values for the "weight" property.
@okram any recollection on why we use
GitHub user velo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/209
TINKERPOP-1041
Same as https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/207
But target on tp31
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15128988#comment-15128988
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1041:
---
GitHub user velo opened a pull
Ok, I made a new PR... shall I close the other one or keep them both?
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Stephen Mallette
wrote:
> This was a very helpful bit of work for windows users - thanks for that.
> I don't think we will merge it for the 3.1.1-incubating release as we've
> frozen that relea
Github user leifurhauks commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/208#issuecomment-178816797
Ah, good point. So it's not quite equivalent to either classic or modern.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
no need to keep the one on master - you can close that one.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Marvin Froeder wrote:
> Ok, I made a new PR... shall I close the other one or keep them both?
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Stephen Mallette
> wrote:
>
>> This was a very helpful bit of work for w
Github user velo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/207
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15129083#comment-15129083
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1041:
---
Github user velo closed the pul
Hi all,
I am trying to port Bitsy graph DB from TP2 to TP3. I have a few questions
on TP3:
1. Is this mailing list searchable? I don't want to ask questions that have
already been answered.
2. Is there any implementation that was ported from TP2 to TP3? I see many
total rewrites, but I'm looking
Github user steveloughran commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/207#discussion_r51644931
--- Diff: appveyor.yml ---
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+version: '{build}'
+
+environment:
+ matrix:
+- JAVA_HOME: C:\Program
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15129154#comment-15129154
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on TINKERPOP-1041:
---
Github user steveloughran comme
As part of my effort to get windows build more stable, I enabled appveyor
to build the project
https://github.com/apache/incubator-tinkerpop/pull/209/files#diff-180360612c6b8c4ed830919bbb4dd459R1
The result is consistent with what I see on my machine:
https://ci.appveyor.com/project/velo/incubato
36 matches
Mail list logo
