ant run-tester will run the tester web application. this works fine.
but what i want to know is, is there a way to run the Testcases written
using junit.
i think that test task is to compile those tests.
amila.
Hi,
I have small question: In which class(es) are the warfiles deployed?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Modified:
tomcat/jasper/tc6.0.x/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/PageInfo.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/jasper/tc6.0.x/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/PageInfo.java?rev=379417r1=379416r2=379417view=diff
Author: remm
Date: Tue Feb 21 02:57:35 2006
New Revision: 379417
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379417view=rev
Log:
- Wire the new EL inside Jasper.
- Remove dependency on commons-el.
- Temporary problem: this now requires a JSP 2.1 API binary to build.
- Small fixes in the EL.
-
Added: tomcat/jasper/tc6.0.x/src/share/org/apache/jasper/el/ELContextImpl.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/jasper/tc6.0.x/src/share/org/apache/jasper/el/ELContextImpl.java?rev=379417view=auto
==
---
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Hi,
I have small question: In which class(es) are the warfiles deployed?
In Tomcat, the deployer is a listener class for the Host, called
HostConfig.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-4.0 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Author: remm
Date: Tue Feb 21 03:28:12 2006
New Revision: 379427
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379427view=rev
Log:
- Fix imports.
- 38726: Remove duplicate request group field.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Protocol.java
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38726.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
George Sexton wrote:
This assumes that committers are an practically unlimited
resource, and they
Of course we have, because we actually own the Intellectual Property.
You are forgetting that we have PMC (Project Management Committee),
that is responsible to deal with all administrative
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 2/21/06, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I've got two other submissions that are not in critical portions
of the code:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352
From your bz report:
...
I think to be compliant with the spec, this must be allowed.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Hi,
I have small question: In which class(es) are the warfiles deployed?
In Tomcat, the deployer is a listener class for the Host, called
HostConfig.
Thanks, I am now in ExpandWar.java ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Rémy
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38716
Yet another perfect example. This time its a WONTFIX, instead of
INVALID, there is some progress to be observed :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Author: remm
Date: Tue Feb 21 06:41:00 2006
New Revision: 379463
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379463view=rev
Log:
- Changelog update.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Added:
tomcat/jasper/tc6.0.x/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp/tagext/TagLibraryInfo.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/tomcat/jasper/tc6.0.x/src/share/javax/servlet/jsp/tagext/TagLibraryInfo.java?rev=379499view=auto
==
Gentlemen, I am running into a problem right now where the manager for a
distributable webapp is the StandardManager, instead of the
CatalinaCluster.createManager result when the cluster is enabled. I have
a feeling the commit below might be related.
I will continue to debug, but if you could
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Gentlemen, I am running into a problem right now where the manager for a
distributable webapp is the StandardManager, instead of the
CatalinaCluster.createManager result when the cluster is enabled. I have
a feeling the commit below might be related.
I will
I reverted the checkin on my local box, and it started to work again, do
you want to handle it, or do you need me to provide you with more info
what the actual cause was?
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Gentlemen, I am running into a problem right now where the
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:48 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: never say never...
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352
From your bz report:
...
I think to be
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:48 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: never say never...
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352
From your bz report:
...
I think to be
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Feb 21 10:06:35 2006
New Revision: 379550
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379550view=rev
Log:
Refactored cluster receiver base, this class should not contain IO logic, since
its a catalina cluster class and not at all participating in the replication
logic.
I applaud to your willing to contribute, but if you wish to
do that, and eventually become a member of the elite, you must
follow some rules, and the first one, like in any company is to
respect your colleagues.
Respect is a two way street. When someone like Bill Barker creates a logic
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
-Original Message-
From: Martin van den Bemt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:24 AM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: never say never...
You are pretty bad in taking examples.
The example I took was specifically chosen because his comments
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38741.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
here is the trace
Name=/replicator
Manager=null
Cluster=null
Distributable=true
as you can see, the cluster reference is null at this point in time.
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
ok, I will dig to the bottom of this :)
Filip
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The following comments are not intended to be a personal attack on anyone.
However, I can't stand by and watch George speak my mind for me, word for word,
and not chime in and say I agree!. Plus, I think if you took a poll, you'd
find he speaks for a large number of list subcribers.
Whether you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Am 21.02.2006 um 15:41 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+ fix
+HttpSession.getId will no longer throw an ISE when the
session is invalid (remm)
+ /fix
Can we reflect the change also to getLastAccessedTime() ?
I thing the DeltaSession need the same change.
Peter
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38741.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Never mind. This isn't worth the heart-ache and I'm probably wrong about
workdir being defined in terms of tempdir. I made this probably wrong
assumption by looking at the startup scripts .
George Sexton
MH Software, Inc.
http://www.mhsoftware.com/
Voice: 303 438 9585
-Original
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 21 14:09:38 2006
New Revision: 379601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379601view=rev
Log:
Minor code clean-up. No functional change.
Modified:
tomcat/jasper/branches/tc4.1.x/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime/JspRuntimeLibrary.java
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 21 14:15:40 2006
New Revision: 379606
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379606view=rev
Log:
Another tweak to keep Gump happy with Java 5.0
Modified:
tomcat/jasper/branches/tc4.1.x/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspRuntimeContext.java
Modified:
No. Bill gave a wrong answer. He ignored in the fact that java.io.tmpdirand
javax.servlet.context.tempdir are equivalent in implementation in Tomcat,
and that to be compliant, Tomcat has to make java.io.tmpdir writable.
File.createTempFile spec says that if a dir is not specified, the file
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Can we reflect the change also to getLastAccessedTime() ?
I thing the DeltaSession need the same change.
I reported getId to the expert group which had changed its behavior very
recently. I did not mention other methods, which didn't seem to be
causing this much
Author: remm
Date: Tue Feb 21 15:02:25 2006
New Revision: 379613
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379613view=rev
Log:
- Woops, use getCluster.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.java
Modified:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
here is the trace
Name=/replicator
Manager=null
Cluster=null
Distributable=true
as you can see, the cluster reference is null at this point in time.
Yeah, well, I guess I should be using getCluster then (I simplified the
code too much when moving it over).
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 21 15:05:18 2006
New Revision: 379617
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379617view=rev
Log:
Preparation for struts 1.2
- Fix deprecation warnings related to struts
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38745.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38740.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38745.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38743.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38352.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 21 14:15:40 2006
New Revision: 379606
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379606view=rev
Log:
Another tweak to keep Gump happy with Java 5.0
Yes, it looks like Gump is finally happy with all Tomcat
56 matches
Mail list logo
