Author: remm
Date: Mon Oct 2 08:52:29 2006
New Revision: 452091
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452091
Log:
- Doc updates.
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml (with props)
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
where is this proposed, 6.0 or 5.5.x dot release?
Sorry it's targeted for 6.0
(I thought it was clear from the patches)
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
[X] I'm for that proposal
[ ] I'm against that proposal
[ ] I don't care
Filip
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider
as very important. It's probably the first vote ever done for
the commited code, but the reasons are known for the folks
-Original Message-
From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 4:25 AM
To: tomcat Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Split soTimeout to soTimeout and keepAliveTimeout
Hi all,
I would like to propose a simple vote on the thing I consider
as very
Bill Barker wrote:
I pretty much agree with Remy: Anything useful this would do has been in
place since the early days of Coyote. Also, anybody that actually would
care about this option almost certainly wouldn't be using the JIO Connector
:).
Fair enough.
Someone even said that there is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38898.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Mladen Turk wrote:
[X] I'm for that proposal
[ ] I'm against that proposal
[ ] I don't care
If you believe there is a requirement for it, the implementation can
be done cleanly and you are prepared to support it then go for it.
I would like to echo Yoav's comments that the docs should be
Author: remm
Date: Mon Oct 2 17:17:20 2006
New Revision: 452281
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452281
Log:
- First pass at docs.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/aio.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39724.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct 2 18:06:12 2006
New Revision: 452287
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452287
Log:
Fix bug 39724. Removing the only valve from a pipeline did not return the
pipeline to its original state. Patched provided by David Gagnon.
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct 2 18:08:32 2006
New Revision: 452288
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452288
Log:
Port fix for bug 39724. Removing the only valve from a pipeline did not return
the pipeline to its original state. Patched provided by David Gagnon.
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Oct 2 18:37:46 2006
New Revision: 452291
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=452291
Log:
Fix bug 35968. Make env entry props input a text area. Patch provided by
Tristan Marly.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/admin/resources/envEntry.jsp
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35968.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36153.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+0
2006/10/3, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mladen Turk wrote:
[X] I'm for that proposal
[ ] I'm against that proposal
[ ] I don't care
If you believe there is a requirement for it, the implementation can
be done cleanly and you are prepared to support it then go for it.
I would like to
15 matches
Mail list logo
