Thanks for all the answers so far - I'll start a new thread for the first
part of the process,
with more details on the coyote changes. The help I need most is review and
comments
from people who spent most time with coyote. The goal of tomcat-lite is to
be small and simple -
hopefully it wont have
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:54:21 2008
New Revision: 690601
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690601&view=rev
Log:
Vote
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=690601&
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008
New Revision: 690600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600&view=rev
Log:
Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/address.c
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/address.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
I am interested to look at the code like the proxy, and see if what it
can do.
I have been longing for a Java-based load-balancing proxy replacement
for Apache httpd. Essentially with non-blocking IO it would seem high
time to replace Apache httpd with a Java-based web
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 21:13 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote:
> I think moving forward, for tomcat-7 and beyond - it would be worth
> reconsidering some of the 10-year-old decisions, and
> tomcat-lite can be a good example on how things can be done
differently:
I still don't intend to participate in
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 12:57:36 2008
New Revision: 690572
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690572&view=rev
Log:
Add some commentary.
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and easier to embed variant. I think it's time to see what can be
> contributed back to tomcat main branch, what can be
> released, and what needs to be retired or moved out.
Overall, a huge +1. I think this is the be
George Sexton wrote:
> Unfortunately, its broken when you run with security enabled.
>
> I worked with Mark Thomas on this on 5.5.26, and he sent me a patch to
> JULI. It looks like it didn't make it in. This issue causes a start up
> error for every context, plus for me, it breaks my app.
That p
Unfortunately, its broken when you run with security enabled.
I worked with Mark Thomas on this on 5.5.26, and he sent me a patch to
JULI. It looks like it didn't make it in. This issue causes a start up
error for every context, plus for me, it breaks my app.
Here's a URL to the patch Mark pr
I for one happen to think this is a great idea (generally).
More specifically, for at least one small web application (where Tomcat is
stripped down and embedded), I have been tempted to strip out the servlet
support code (for a number of reasons).
10 matches
Mail list logo