Re: Tomcat-Lite - part 1

2008-08-30 Thread Costin Manolache
Thanks for all the answers so far - I'll start a new thread for the first part of the process, with more details on the coyote changes. The help I need most is review and comments from people who spent most time with coyote. The goal of tomcat-lite is to be small and simple - hopefully it wont have

svn commit: r690601 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2008-08-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sat Aug 30 15:54:21 2008 New Revision: 690601 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690601&view=rev Log: Vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=690601&

svn commit: r690600 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/address.c

2008-08-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008 New Revision: 690600 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600&view=rev Log: Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/address.c Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/address.

Re: Tomcat-Lite - part 1

2008-08-30 Thread Jess Holle
Remy Maucherat wrote: I am interested to look at the code like the proxy, and see if what it can do. I have been longing for a Java-based load-balancing proxy replacement for Apache httpd. Essentially with non-blocking IO it would seem high time to replace Apache httpd with a Java-based web

Re: Tomcat-Lite - part 1

2008-08-30 Thread Remy Maucherat
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 21:13 -0700, Costin Manolache wrote: > I think moving forward, for tomcat-7 and beyond - it would be worth > reconsidering some of the 10-year-old decisions, and > tomcat-lite can be a good example on how things can be done differently: I still don't intend to participate in

svn commit: r690572 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2008-08-30 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Sat Aug 30 12:57:36 2008 New Revision: 690572 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690572&view=rev Log: Add some commentary. Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/

Re: Tomcat-Lite - part 1

2008-08-30 Thread Yoav Shapira
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > and easier to embed variant. I think it's time to see what can be > contributed back to tomcat main branch, what can be > released, and what needs to be retired or moved out. Overall, a huge +1. I think this is the be

Re: 5.5.27 candidate binaries

2008-08-30 Thread Mark Thomas
George Sexton wrote: > Unfortunately, its broken when you run with security enabled. > > I worked with Mark Thomas on this on 5.5.26, and he sent me a patch to > JULI. It looks like it didn't make it in. This issue causes a start up > error for every context, plus for me, it breaks my app. That p

Re: 5.5.27 candidate binaries

2008-08-30 Thread George Sexton
Unfortunately, its broken when you run with security enabled. I worked with Mark Thomas on this on 5.5.26, and he sent me a patch to JULI. It looks like it didn't make it in. This issue causes a start up error for every context, plus for me, it breaks my app. Here's a URL to the patch Mark pr

Re: Tomcat-Lite - part 1

2008-08-30 Thread Preston L. Bannister
I for one happen to think this is a great idea (generally). More specifically, for at least one small web application (where Tomcat is stripped down and embedded), I have been tempted to strip out the servlet support code (for a number of reasons).