DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47018] application output redirection to context log (swallowOutput) does not work if context is loaded on startup

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47018 Steve Yates steven.ya...@springsource.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

svn commit: r765094 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2009-04-15 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Apr 15 09:38:07 2009 New Revision: 765094 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765094view=rev Log: Propose a native update Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt URL:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46950] SSL renegotiation does not occur when resource with CLIENT-CERT auth is requested

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2009-04-15 04:38:10 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) What works for you? The security constraint and login configuration I posted which requires SSL for the entire context but only

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30482] ERROR:JSP:_jspx_meth_bean_message_0:struts compile error

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30482 --- Comment #7 from koenigworks9 koenigwor...@yahoo.es 2009-04-15 04:03:14 PST --- Yes, me too. I have the same situation JBoss_3_2_5 with Apache Tomcat/5.0.26 and Struts 1.1: 2009-04-15 11:08:16,197 ERROR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46950] SSL renegotiation does not occur when resource with CLIENT-CERT auth is requested

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950 Andr an...@cabine.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46950] SSL renegotiation does not occur when resource with CLIENT-CERT auth is requested

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46950 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2009-04-15 05:21:57 PST --- OK, I can confirm this when I test with the APR/native connector. Looking for a fix now... -- Configure bugmail:

svn commit: r765153 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java

2009-04-15 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Apr 15 12:26:25 2009 New Revision: 765153 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765153view=rev Log: Remove unnecessary code Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47036] New: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.DelegatingResultSet

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036 Summary: java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.DelegatingResultSet Product: Tomcat 5 Version: 5.5.27 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP

gsoc project - Tomcat proxy [query]

2009-04-15 Thread Sharmistha jat
Dear All, I have applied for tomcat proxy project, but i needed a little more information than given in the project idea, to start with the design of proxy. So i would like to know more about the following: 1) Type of proxy [reverse,content filter,caching etc]. 2) Use [intent] I have studied

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47036] java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.DelegatingResultSet

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

Re: gsoc project - Tomcat proxy [query]

2009-04-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
Sharmistha jat wrote: Dear All, I have applied for tomcat proxy project, but i needed a little more information than given in the project idea, to start with the design of proxy. So i would like to know more about the following: 1) Type of proxy [reverse,content filter,caching etc]. Just a

Re: gsoc project - Tomcat proxy [query]

2009-04-15 Thread Jess Holle
A Tomcat-based reverse proxy with a pluggable load balancer would be /huge/ in my opinion. Having to resort to Apache (or a hardware load balancer) to distribute load across multiple Tomcats is /really /unfortunate. What's needed is a high-performance Java-based proxy load balancer that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47036] java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.DelegatingResultSet

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036 ydkalyan ydkal...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47036] java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.DelegatingResultSet

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47036 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

svn commit: r765223 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2009-04-15 Thread jfclere
Author: jfclere Date: Wed Apr 15 14:56:38 2009 New Revision: 765223 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765223view=rev Log: Found a typo... Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r765226 - /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt

2009-04-15 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Apr 15 15:01:35 2009 New Revision: 765226 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765226view=rev Log: Vote Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt URL:

Re: gsoc project - Tomcat proxy [query]

2009-04-15 Thread jean-frederic clere
Sharmistha jat wrote: So, now i would try to install a tomcat cluster and make a simple servlet proxy [reverse] for it, then add in load-balancing logic to it Yep thst is the idea. +++ CUT +++ I have studied a number of servlet proxies like j2ep, noodle Http Proxy Servlet in past days.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47038] New: USE_FLOCK_LK redefined compiler warning when using --enable-flock

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038 Summary: USE_FLOCK_LK redefined compiler warning when using --enable-flock Product: Tomcat Connectors Version: 1.2.28 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status:

svn commit: r765406 - /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/host.xml

2009-04-15 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Apr 15 22:44:49 2009 New Revision: 765406 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765406view=rev Log: As a result of https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46924 make the documentation clearer about what Tomcat will do if a WAR/DIR/context file is deleted or

svn commit: r765407 - /tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/host.xml

2009-04-15 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Apr 15 22:45:40 2009 New Revision: 765407 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765407view=rev Log: Typo. Why do I always spot them just after committing a change? Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/host.xml Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/host.xml

svn commit: r765411 - in /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs: changelog.xml config/host.xml

2009-04-15 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Apr 15 22:52:51 2009 New Revision: 765411 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=765411view=rev Log: Update docs in light of https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46924 Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Any way to fix bug 46950 without a change to tcnative?

2009-04-15 Thread Mark Thomas
Folks, I have been looking at bug 46950 [1]. Everything is fine with the BIO connector but with APR the renegotiation fails to trigger a request for the user's certificate. I assume that this is because the socket is still associated with an SSLContext where the SSLVerifyClient is something other

Re: Any way to fix bug 46950 without a change to tcnative?

2009-04-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mark Thomas wrote: Folks, I have been looking at bug 46950 [1]. Everything is fine with the BIO connector but with APR the renegotiation fails to trigger a request for the user's certificate. I assume that this is because the socket is still associated with an SSLContext where the

Re: Any way to fix bug 46950 without a change to tcnative?

2009-04-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Folks, I have been looking at bug 46950 [1]. Everything is fine with the BIO connector but with APR the renegotiation fails to trigger a request for the user's certificate. I assume that this is because the socket is still associated with an

Re: gsoc project - Tomcat proxy [query]

2009-04-15 Thread Costin Manolache
One suggestion: I think it would be nice to consider scalability - if you have one tomcat frontend forwarding to 100 backends and acting as a load balancer - you probably can't afford one connection per thread. Many of the http forwarders I know use a blocking http client library - I think this

Re: gsoc project - Tomcat proxy [query]

2009-04-15 Thread Sharmistha jat
Thanks for suggestion. [:)] On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Costin Manolache cos...@gmail.com wrote: One suggestion: I think it would be nice to consider scalability - if you have one tomcat frontend forwarding to 100 backends and acting as a load balancer - you probably can't afford one