https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49890
Andrey Timofeev andrey.timofe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 11:42:55 2010
New Revision: 997291
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997291view=rev
Log:
Address a concern raised in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
Re-factor code to clarify con is never null when release is called.
Modified:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2010-09-15 07:43:12 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #0)
There is also an issue with connection create failing causing the pool size to
be incremented but not decremented. In the
On Sep 8, 2010, at 10:50 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The builds for Tomcat 5.5.31 are ready for testing and approval.
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
According to the release process, the 5.5.31 build corresponding to the
tag
Why? The fact that the ASF has retired httpd-1.3 doesn't mean
that the world has stopped using it, or *will* stop using it
before the next connectors release.
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:15 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 3/1/2010 4:45 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:24:14 2010
New Revision: 997321
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997321view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
Move the offering of a new thread on release from the abandoned connection code
to the release code to
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:26:12 2010
New Revision: 997323
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997323view=rev
Log:
Update changelog
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/doc/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/doc/changelog.xml
URL:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:29:47 2010
New Revision: 997326
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997326view=rev
Log:
Fix Javadoc
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/ConnectionPool.java
Modified:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:34:42 2010
New Revision: 997329
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997329view=rev
Log:
Include the suffix in the version number
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/build.xml
URL:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:39:08 2010
New Revision: 997331
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997331view=rev
Log:
Fix niggle
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/build.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/build.xml
URL:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 13:41:18 2010
New Revision: 997332
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997332view=rev
Log:
Tag 1.0.9.0
Added:
tomcat/tags/JDBC_POOL_1_0_9_0/ (props changed)
- copied from r997331, tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/
Propchange:
It would be good to get an official release of jdbc-pool up on the
mirrors. If this vote passes, I'll add some appropriate pages to the web
site for docs, downloads etc.
1.0.9.0 fixes a small number of bugs reported against 1.0.8.5 both in
Bugzilla and through $work.
The candidates source and
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 15 14:03:13 2010
New Revision: 997341
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997341view=rev
Log:
Remove empty dir
Removed:
tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/interceptor/
On 15/09/2010 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
It would be good to get an official release of jdbc-pool up on the
mirrors. If this vote passes, I'll add some appropriate pages to the web
site for docs, downloads etc.
1.0.9.0 fixes a small number of bugs reported against 1.0.8.5 both in
Bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584
Peter peter_s_...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|1.1.19 |1.1.20
As I mention recently, JMX is now looking pretty good. I have drafted a
blog entry [1] on this topic that I'd like to publish later this week.
Review / feedback welcome.
Mark
[1]
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomcat/?previewEntry=tomcat_7_trunk_and_jmx
On 9/14/2010 5:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.09.2010 01:14, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 9/13/2010 6:11 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
I agree with this approach.
I'd like to get a 1.2.31 release out sometime to release the ISAPI
Redirector log rotation though, before we start on 1.3.
Just
Looks good.
It would be really cool to supplement this with a YouTube video of a
screen walking through the steps laid out while playing with JConsole.
-Tim
On 9/15/2010 11:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
As I mention recently, JMX is now looking pretty good. I have drafted a
blog entry [1] on
There is no issue. If there is a typo in the developer code, there is a
typo in the code. And sometimes typos cause security issues. As a
general rule, any code which is user provided should validated and
output escaped.
This is a topic which should be discussed on the user list.
-Tim
On
Thanks for your replay. Will do. Moving conversation to user list.
Michael Coates
OWASP
On 9/15/10 11:59 AM, Tim Funk wrote:
There is no issue. If there is a typo in the developer code, there is
a typo in the code. And sometimes typos cause security issues. As a
general rule, any code which
On 15/09/2010 20:44, Wesley Acheson wrote:
Was there something wrong with this question?
Nope. Answers in-line.
I think the documentation in tomcat 7 about building tomcat is
incorrect or out of date.
Yep.
1 Checkout from http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk. This was
the location
you could add a word on persistence of the JMX configuration. As far as I
understand, the modifications done through JMX are not persisted, is that
correct ?
Sylvain
On 15 sept. 2010, at 17:07, Mark Thomas wrote:
As I mention recently, JMX is now looking pretty good. I have drafted a
blog
It may be worth showing some code as well on how to start tomcat and use JMX
to configure it. Maybe in a separate post.
Costin
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Sylvain Laurent sylvain.laur...@m4x.orgwrote:
you could add a word on persistence of the JMX configuration. As far as I
understand,
Okay a last questions in this case. Also please note works pretty
hetic at the moment. If theres multiple changes to be made it may take
some time.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 15/09/2010 20:44, Wesley Acheson wrote:
6 I received an error that two
2 Tried ant download as per
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/building.html#Building%20Tomcat.
Apparently there is no target called download
Already fixed in svn.
In trunk? because I just tried a fresh checkout doesn't seem to have
that target.
On 15/09/2010 22:32, Wesley Acheson wrote:
2 Tried ant download as per
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/building.html#Building%20Tomcat.
Apparently there is no target called download
Already fixed in svn.
In trunk? because I just tried a fresh checkout doesn't seem to have
that
On 15/09/2010 22:07, Wesley Acheson wrote:
Okay a last questions in this case. Also please note works pretty
hetic at the moment. If theres multiple changes to be made it may take
some time.
No problem. We are all volunteers here.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
Summary: recursive tag calls don't work
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: 5.5.30
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
--- Comment #1 from Peter Giles gil...@u.washington.edu 2010-09-15 18:28:01
EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=26029)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26029)
image showing how the page renders on other versions of
On 12/09/2010 17:45, Mark Thomas wrote:
Digging into the root causes of [1] it appears that there are a number
of threading / timing issues with the current AsyncContextImpl. Running
the provided test case with ab -n 50 -c 20 triggers the error every
couple of runs. The error appears to occur
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
Eric Westfall ewest...@indiana.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 15 September 2010 14:55, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
It would be good to get an official release of jdbc-pool up on the
mirrors. If this vote passes, I'll add some appropriate pages to the web
site for docs, downloads etc.
1.0.9.0 fixes a small number of bugs reported against
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42826
--- Comment #2 from zawecha1 zawecha...@sina.com 2010-09-15 23:53:17 EDT ---
workers.properties set recovery_options=3 is fine。
解释：
recovery_options属性说明了web server在检测到Tomcat失败后如何进行恢复工作。默认情况下，web
I think this is how AsyncContextImpl creates async listeners (lines 228ff)
@Override
public T extends AsyncListener T createListener(ClassT clazz)
throws ServletException {
T listener = null;
try {
listener = clazz.newInstance();
} catch
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
Summary: Problems with AsyncListener and resource injection
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
On Sep 15, 2010, at 9:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I think this is how AsyncContextImpl creates async listeners (lines 228ff)
@Override
public T extends AsyncListener T createListener(ClassT clazz)
throws ServletException {
T listener = null;
try {
37 matches
Mail list logo
