Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Jan 24 08:35:21 2011
New Revision: 1062677
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062677view=rev
Log:
Convert hex sequences in properties file to lowercase.
No changes in the text itself. This is to simplify patch that follows.
CTR: translations
Modified:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Jan 24 08:44:11 2011
New Revision: 1062679
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062679view=rev
Log:
Replace broken patch with a new one
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Mon Jan 24 09:03:24 2011
New Revision: 1062688
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062688view=rev
Log:
proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
Hi to all,
I take a look at RemoteIpValve and wonder if they are plan to handle
also x-forwarded-host, x-forwarded-port and x-forwarded-proto ?
The idea will be to use them to replace
getLocalName/getLocalPort/getScheme by x-forwarded-host,
x-forwarded-port and x-forwarded-proto.
The fix should
On 24/01/2011 10:00, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi to all,
I take a look at RemoteIpValve and wonder if they are plan to handle
also x-forwarded-host, x-forwarded-port and x-forwarded-proto ?
The idea will be to use them to replace
getLocalName/getLocalPort/getScheme by x-forwarded-host,
On 22/01/2011 13:17, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if this need a more official/formal vote ?
So what are next steps now ?
Does this need to be via the incubator? This is an existing project but
the likely destination is not as a Tomcat sub-project but as a module.
I'm not sure.
On 2011-01-24, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/01/2011 13:17, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I don't know if this need a more official/formal vote ?
So what are next steps now ?
Does this need to be via the incubator? This is an existing project but
the likely destination is not as a Tomcat
Ok sounds reasonnable.
I will inform mojo community and at least start a vote in the mojo dev ml.
Thanks,
--
Olivier Lamy
http://twitter.com/olamy
http://www.linkedin.com/in/olamy
2011/1/24 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org:
On 2011-01-24, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/01/2011 13:17, Olivier Lamy
x-forwarded-proto is already handled.
Exact.
x-forwarded-host is non-trivial since the mapping is done before the
valve is invoked. Simpler to do the equivalent of ProxyPreserveHost On
in the proxy.
x-forwarded-port is not handled directly but x-forwarded-proto does set
the port based on
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Summary: Keystore in AbstractEndpoint doesn't have to be a file
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: trunk
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Summary: keepAliveProtectection doesn't work
Product: Tomcat 7
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
ja...@howeswho.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|keepAliveProtectection |keepAliveProtection doesn't
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
ja...@howeswho.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |7.0.4
--
Configure
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 24 17:18:40 2011
New Revision: 1062886
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062886view=rev
Log:
Remove unused import
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/connector/TestRequest.java
Modified:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
2011-01-24 14:46:24 EST ---
Could this be something that is done speculatively?
I'm not sure HttpClient can be rigged to definitely launch it's thread during
Tomcat
Author: markt
Date: Mon Jan 24 20:06:12 2011
New Revision: 1062955
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062955view=rev
Log:
Small simplification
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Jan 24 21:04:55 2011
New Revision: 1062976
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062976view=rev
Log:
Release information.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/build.properties.default
URL:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Jan 24 21:09:49 2011
New Revision: 1062979
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1062979view=rev
Log:
tag for release 6.0.31.
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_31/ (props changed)
- copied from r1062978, tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/
Propchange:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.31/
According to the release process, the 6.0.31 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_31 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
I'd opt for the default value to be true. I rather have usability than
spec compliance.
that's exactly what the STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE flag does, it opts for
usability,performance etc rather than spec compliance, and the default
value I believe is false on that flag.
Filip
On 01/21/2011
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Gerard Borst gerard-bo...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |minor
--
21 matches
Mail list logo
