svn commit: r1306209 - in /tomcat/jk/trunk/native: apache-1.3/mod_jk.c apache-2.0/mod_jk.c common/jk_shm.c common/jk_shm.h iis/jk_isapi_plugin.c netscape/jk_nsapi_plugin.c

2012-03-28 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Wed Mar 28 08:17:59 2012 New Revision: 1306209 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306209view=rev Log: Step one in shared memory simplification. Make each allocated slot of same size. It'll waste few bytes, but will ensure grater consistency Modified:

svn commit: r1306271 - in /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common: jk_uri_worker_map.c jk_uri_worker_map.h

2012-03-28 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Wed Mar 28 11:49:55 2012 New Revision: 1306271 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306271view=rev Log: Add global uriworker_map id. We'll use this a parent for workers so we can find multiple workers having the same name but belonging to a different uw map Modified:

svn commit: r1306276 - /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c

2012-03-28 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Wed Mar 28 11:53:38 2012 New Revision: 1306276 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306276view=rev Log: Fix compile warning. Use httpd provided strchr for const strings Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.c Modified:

Re: [JK] Shared memory design problems

2012-03-28 Thread jean-frederic clere
What about a look on file that contains the id? It gets created and lock by the first worker that needs the shared memory and writes the id inside and unlock the file? Other workers will just read the id in the file. Cheers Jean-Frederic

svn commit: r1306287 - in /tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common: jk_map.c jk_map.h

2012-03-28 Thread mturk
Author: mturk Date: Wed Mar 28 12:16:52 2012 New Revision: 1306287 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306287view=rev Log: Add global jk_map id. Similar to uri mappings this is for getting the unique context where workers gets created Modified: tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_map.c

Re: svn commit: r1305931 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool: doc/ src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/ src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/jmx/

2012-03-28 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/27 fha...@apache.org: Author: fhanik Date: Tue Mar 27 17:55:41 2012 New Revision: 1305931 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305931view=rev Log: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52066 Add in a configuration attribute to allow a thread interrupt state to be

Re: [JK] Shared memory design problems

2012-03-28 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/28/2012 02:01 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: What about a look on file that contains the id? It gets created and lock by the first worker that needs the shared memory and writes the id inside and unlock the file? Other workers will just read the id in the file. I started to work on

MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6

2012-03-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
Are there any plans to backport r723889 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=723889, Add the ability to configure a job queue size, and a timeout for how long we want to try to add something to the queue.) to Tomcat 6? Having the MaxQueueSize attribute available for executors in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taglibs Parent POM 3

2012-03-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Request for more votes please, we only have one binding vote so far. Thanks Jeremy On Mar 27, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: +1 2012/3/26 Jeremy Boynes jboy...@apache.org: The proposed 3 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is now available for voting. This release addresses

Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6

2012-03-28 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/28 Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com: Are there any plans to backport r723889 (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=723889, Add the ability to configure a job queue size, and a timeout for how long we want to try to add something to the queue.)

RE: svn commit: r1305931 - in /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool: doc/ src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/ src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/jmx/

2012-03-28 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
If InterruptedException was thrown by JRE it alone means that interrupted flag has been cleared. So Thread.interrupted() call is a NOOP. (Effectively the interruption state means to interrupt the next wait() etc. call immediately when they are called. When the actual interruption happens

svn commit: r1306410 - /tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/pool/ConnectionPool.java

2012-03-28 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Mar 28 15:23:41 2012 New Revision: 1306410 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306410view=rev Log: Per http://markmail.org/message/nhfcvvyvvhtzvaxq Since the method that gets interrupted does something like if (Thread.interrupted()) throw new

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52066] ConnectionPool.borrowConnection swallows interrupt state.

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52066 --- Comment #8 from Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org 2012-03-28 15:25:49 UTC --- Please note that the interrupt flag was already cleared, this commit does change things around a bit http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306410view=rev I've made an

svn commit: r1306413 - /tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/modules/

2012-03-28 Thread fhanik
Author: fhanik Date: Wed Mar 28 15:27:26 2012 New Revision: 1306413 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306413view=rev Log: Since the method that gets interrupted does something like if (Thread.interrupted()) throw new InterruptedException(); The flag is actually cleared by

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taglibs Parent POM 3

2012-03-28 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
[+1] Released -Original Message- From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:jer...@boynes.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 11:02 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Taglibs Parent POM 3 The proposed 3 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Taglibs Parent POM 3

2012-03-28 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
-Original Message- From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:jer...@boynes.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:38 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taglibs Parent POM 3 Request for more votes please, we only have one binding vote so

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52318] Version in tomcat-jdbc POM is conflicted with Version in MANIFEST for JULI JAR

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52318 Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52996] New: Please backport r723889 from trunk to have MaxQueueSize attribute for Executor available in Tomcat 6

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52996 Bug #: 52996 Summary: Please backport r723889 from trunk to have MaxQueueSize attribute for Executor available in Tomcat 6 Product: Tomcat 6 Version:

RE: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6

2012-03-28 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , Vodafone Group
-Original Message- From: Konstantin Kolinko Sent: Mittwoch, 28. März 2012 17:05 To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: have Re: MaxQueueSize for Executor and Tomcat 6 2012/3/28 Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group Are there any plans to backport r723889

RE: svn commit: r1306130 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup: LocalStrings.properties UserConfig.java

2012-03-28 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
-Original Message- From: kfuj...@apache.org [mailto:kfuj...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 8:51 PM To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1306130 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup: LocalStrings.properties UserConfig.java +for

buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2012-03-28 Thread buildbot
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/2901 Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu Build Reason: scheduler Build Source

RE: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2012-03-28 Thread Filip Hanik (mailing lists)
Is it my email client, or are some of these emails empty? -Original Message- From: build...@apache.org [mailto:build...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 10:00 AM To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2012-03-28 Thread Markus Schönhaber
28.03.2012 18:31, Filip Hanik (mailing lists): Is it my email client, or are some of these emails empty? It's probably your client. That's the body of the mail you responded to: The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building ASF Buildbot. Full details are

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2012-03-28 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/28 Markus Schönhaber tomcat-...@list-post.mks-mail.de: 28.03.2012 18:31, Filip Hanik (mailing lists): Is it my email client, or are some of these emails empty? It's probably your client. That's the body of the mail you responded to: The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52688] Added ability to have access logs output to standard logging mechanism

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 Mark markclaass...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28344|0 |1 is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52688] Added ability to have access logs output to standard logging mechanism

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 --- Comment #4 from Mark markclaass...@gmail.com 2012-03-28 18:00:32 UTC --- Created attachment 28516 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28516 One error message was added for when a file could not be deleted --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52688] Added ability to have access logs output to standard logging mechanism

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 --- Comment #5 from Mark markclaass...@gmail.com 2012-03-28 18:01:17 UTC --- Created attachment 28517 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28517 Two new parameters to support configuration of old file deletion --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52688] Added ability to have access logs output to standard logging mechanism

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 --- Comment #6 from Mark markclaass...@gmail.com 2012-03-28 18:01:27 UTC --- What I really want to be able to do is delete older access log files. I was thinking that using a standard logger in the AccessLogValve was the way to do that.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52688] Add ability to remove old access log files

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 Mark markclaass...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Added ability to have |Add ability to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52688] Add ability to remove old access log files

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 Mark markclaass...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0.25 |7.0.26 --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52318] Version in tomcat-jdbc POM is conflicted with Version in MANIFEST for JULI JAR

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52318 --- Comment #10 from pan4o ssku4...@web.de 2012-03-28 18:07:02 UTC --- what's in the POM is not really related to what should be in an OSGI manifest though. Nothing should prevent you from dropping this library into a container

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52688] Add ability to remove old access log files

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 --- Comment #7 from Mark markclaass...@gmail.com 2012-03-28 18:55:55 UTC --- Another thing I realized (that I don't want to forget) is that there are 2 predefined log output formats: common and combined. These have date/time stamps

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on tomcat-trunk

2012-03-28 Thread Markus Schönhaber
28.03.2012 19:42, Konstantin Kolinko: 2012/3/28 Markus Schönhaber tomcat-...@list-post.mks-mail.de: 28.03.2012 18:31, Filip Hanik (mailing lists): Is it my email client, or are some of these emails empty? It's probably your client. That's the body of the mail you responded to: [...]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52318] Version in tomcat-jdbc POM is conflicted with Version in MANIFEST for JULI JAR

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52318 --- Comment #11 from Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org 2012-03-28 19:10:09 UTC --- yes, the jdbc-pool library can be built on tomcat 7 and you can drop that into a Tomcat 6 container, and it will work just fine against the tomcat 6 juli library

svn commit: r1306556 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProtocol.java

2012-03-28 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Mar 28 19:42:47 2012 New Revision: 1306556 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306556view=rev Log: When using automatic ports, include the port number in the name used in logging if we know it. Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProtocol.java

svn commit: r1306579 - /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AbstractEndpoint.java

2012-03-28 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Mar 28 20:35:02 2012 New Revision: 1306579 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306579view=rev Log: Fix intermittent JMX deregistration test failure. Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AbstractEndpoint.java Modified:

svn commit: r1306580 - /tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/mbeans/TestRegistration.java

2012-03-28 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Mar 28 20:36:02 2012 New Revision: 1306580 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306580view=rev Log: Tweak the test so it can easily be run multiple times in a row without failing. Modified: tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/mbeans/TestRegistration.java

svn commit: r1306586 - in /tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/coyote/AbstractProtocol.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2012-03-28 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Mar 28 20:39:13 2012 New Revision: 1306586 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306586view=rev Log: When using automatic ports, include the port number in the name used in logging if we know it. Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)

svn commit: r1306589 - in /tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk: ./ java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AbstractEndpoint.java webapps/docs/changelog.xml

2012-03-28 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Mar 28 20:48:41 2012 New Revision: 1306589 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306589view=rev Log: Fix intermittent JMX deregistration test failure. Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)

svn commit: r1306591 - in /tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk: ./ test/org/apache/catalina/mbeans/TestRegistration.java

2012-03-28 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Wed Mar 28 20:49:57 2012 New Revision: 1306591 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306591view=rev Log: Tweak the test so it can easily be run multiple times in a row without failing. Modified: tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52974] NameNotFoundException is thrown when field/method is annotated with @Resource annotation

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52974 --- Comment #3 from Violeta Georgieva violet...@apache.org 2012-03-28 20:50:47 UTC --- Thanks and Regards Violeta -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52998] New: Performance issue with ExpressionFactory.newInstance()

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52998 Bug #: 52998 Summary: Performance issue with ExpressionFactory.newInstance() Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.26 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52999] New: Performance issue with locking in ContainerBase.fireContainerEvent()

2012-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52999 Bug #: 52999 Summary: Performance issue with locking in ContainerBase.fireContainerEvent() Product: Tomcat 7 Version: 7.0.26 Platform: PC OS/Version:

Re: Two performance problems (found during myfaces testing)

2012-03-28 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/3/9 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com: 2012/3/9 Martin Koci martin.kocicak.k...@gmail.com: Hi, we did  performance tests in myfaces core project recently and we found two performance problems in tomcat (7.0.26): 1) javax.el.ExpressionFactory.newInstance() does not cache

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test (in module tomcat-7.0.x) failed

2012-03-28 Thread Bill Barker
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project tomcat-tc7.0.x-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

svn commit: r1306716 - in /tomcat/trunk: build.properties.default build.xml

2012-03-28 Thread costin
Author: costin Date: Thu Mar 29 04:46:56 2012 New Revision: 1306716 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1306716view=rev Log: Build the tomcat-jni and tomcat-spdy as separate jars, so they can be used independently. Add a dependency to an apache-license optional interface to support TLS NPN

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Taglibs Parent POM 3

2012-03-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
My non-binding +1 but one more PMC vote is needed please. Thanks Jeremy On Mar 28, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote: -Original Message- From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:jer...@boynes.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 8:38 AM To:

Re: svn commit: r1306130 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup: LocalStrings.properties UserConfig.java

2012-03-28 Thread Keiichi Fujino
2012/3/29 Filip Hanik (mailing lists) devli...@hanik.com: -Original Message- From: kfuj...@apache.org [mailto:kfuj...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 8:51 PM To: dev@tomcat.apache.org Subject: svn commit: r1306130 - in /tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup:

Re: Jenkins configuration

2012-03-28 Thread Jeremy Boynes
A checkout of trunks is building on my Mac using Maven 3.0.3 but failing in a similar way to Jenkins with Maven 3.0.4 It works with 3.0.4 if I remove the -T3 so that it builds single threaded, but the last successful build #15 also used 3.0.4 and -T3 I propose to remove the -T3 in the