+1
On 06/26/2012 10:11 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
and there are some regressions in 7.0.28 that I'd rather fix
sooner than later.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 27/06/2012 05:48, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/6/27 build...@apache.org:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3129
Buildbot URL:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 08:17:14 2012
New Revision: 1354362
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354362view=rev
Log:
Add file missed in r1354255
Added:
tomcat/trunk/test/webapp-3.0/bug53465.jsp (with props)
Added: tomcat/trunk/test/webapp-3.0/bug53465.jsp
URL:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 08:18:06 2012
New Revision: 1354364
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354364view=rev
Log:
Add file missed in r1354258
Added:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/test/webapp-3.0/bug53465.jsp
- copied unchanged from r1354362,
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53473
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Summary: Error in isVirtualWebappRelative param configuration
Severity: minor
Classification: Unclassified
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 08:51:57 2012
New Revision: 1354375
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354375view=rev
Log:
Add some finals
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/websocket/WebSocketServlet.java
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/websocket/WsFrame.java
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53454
--- Comment #3 from Nikita Skvortsov n.s.skvort...@gmail.com ---
Christopher,
Thank you for provided workaround. I will use it. Still, I agree with Mark,
that it is Tomcat's implementation of API, and it violates API specification in
part
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/3130
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-7-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-7-trunk/builds/708
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: bb-vm_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 12:46:05 2012
New Revision: 1354469
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354469view=rev
Log:
Make the request available when the WebSocket connection is being created
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/websocket/WsHttpServletRequestWrapper.java
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 12:47:42 2012
New Revision: 1354472
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354472view=rev
Log:
Add finals
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/websocket/WebSocketServlet.java
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 12:50:37 2012
New Revision: 1354477
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354477view=rev
Log:
Make the request available when the WebSocket connection is being created
Added:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
Just for information (to save others having to look up RFC 2396) ',' is
reserved, '[' is not permitted and ']' is not permitted. All three must be
escaped before being used.
This does
Hi!
I was experimenting with Servlet 3.0 file upload. What seems odd is
that after request is processed the uploaded files are still present
in the work directory of the web application.
The only way to reliably delete those files is what HTMLManagerServlet
does, like
IteratorPart iter
From: Chris R [mailto:chris.tech...@gmail.com]
Subject: Race condition in DefaultServlet
If multiple threads call doPut(...), there is a possibility that they can
clobber each other and the value of accessCount may not really give the
exact number of accesses of the cache.
Which is noted
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
--- Comment #5 from Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org ---
Roger, I will fix this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
On 27/06/2012 17:19, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
I was experimenting with Servlet 3.0 file upload. What seems odd is
that after request is processed the uploaded files are still present
in the work directory of the web application.
The only way to reliably delete those files is what
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
--- Comment #6 from Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Use of multiple versions of a web application may also trigger the issue (I
haven't tested it).
That wont be issue, as the ObjectName will have something like
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Jun 27 17:36:05 2012
New Revision: 1354641
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354641view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
Make sure we retain the domain if the registration comes from Tomcat
Modified:
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Jun 27 17:38:08 2012
New Revision: 1354642
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354642view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/modules/ (props changed)
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53454
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net ---
(In reply to comment #2)
It is Tomcat's implementation of the Servlet API so this is a Tomcat bug.
Oh, I didn't realize that the servlet-api.jar that ships with
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
r1345357 is not responsible for this. It looks like r1344890 is.
I am currently looking for a solution that works with this bug, bug53257 and
bug51584.
--
You are receiving this mail
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 18:50:50 2012
New Revision: 1354664
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354664view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
Use more explicit URI constructor to ensure components are correctly encoded.
Added:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 18:54:58 2012
New Revision: 1354667
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354667view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
Use more explicit URI constructor to ensure components are correctly encoded.
Added:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53467
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
As some of you noticed, I added in the stubs for Servlet 3.1 yesterday.
I'm planning on starting on 3.1 features, mainly the non blocking
read/writes.
In Tomcat, we already have an implementation of this in the sandbox
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/sandbox/gdev6x/
That works fully, and
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On 27/06/2012 20:16, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
As some of you noticed, I added in the stubs for Servlet 3.1 yesterday.
I'm planning on starting on 3.1 features, mainly the non blocking
read/writes.
In Tomcat, we already have an implementation of this in the sandbox
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 19:37:19 2012
New Revision: 1354685
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354685view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Correct documentation and web.xml comments for SSI isVirtualWebappRelative
option since the allowed values
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jun 27 19:38:46 2012
New Revision: 1354686
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354686view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Correct documentation and web.xml comments for SSI isVirtualWebappRelative
option since the allowed values
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
3.1 seems to be a fairly minor update so far, so we should be able to
start
pushing Tomcat 8 right around the time as the spec is finalized.
Just a word of caution. The EG is far from agreed on the best way to do
the non-blocking API at the moment. As with happened with the 3.0 async
On 27/06/2012 20:49, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
My current focus on Tomcat 8 is re-factoring the resources to remove all
the JNDI stuff. After that, I'll probably look at the HTTP upgrade bit.
[Filip Hanik]
Interesting, what's up with JNDI, prolly something I missed from an earlier
3.1 seems to be a fairly minor update so far, so we should be able to
start
pushing Tomcat 8 right around the time as the spec is finalized.
Just a word of caution. The EG is far from agreed on the best way to do
the non-blocking API at the moment. As with happened with the 3.0 async
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jun 28 05:44:54 2012
New Revision: 1354817
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354817view=rev
Log:
Correct typos in recent commits
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/ant/antlib.xml
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/ssi-howto.xml
Modified:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jun 28 05:47:30 2012
New Revision: 1354818
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354818view=rev
Log:
Correct typo in r1354686
It is merge of revision 1354817 from trunk
Modified:
tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/ (props changed)
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jun 28 05:54:00 2012
New Revision: 1354820
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1354820view=rev
Log:
CTR: docs
Merged revision 1354685 from tomcat/trunk:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53473
Correct documentation and web.xml comments for SSI
38 matches
Mail list logo
