Re: Maven snapshot builds

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know what is the reason for the missing -SNAPSHOT builds at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomcat/tomcat-catalina/ > (RAO) ? > >

Maven snapshot builds

Hi, Does anyone know what is the reason for the missing -SNAPSHOT builds at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/tomcat/tomcat-catalina/ (RAO) ? https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/maven-jars.html says that the snapshots should be at

svn commit: r1737428 - /tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-8.5-doc/building.html

Author: mgrigorov Date: Fri Apr 1 20:01:53 2016 New Revision: 1737428 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737428=rev Log: s/8.0/8.5/ in links text Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-8.5-doc/building.html Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-8.5-doc/building.html URL:

Re: Project Jigsaw: The module system was integrated into JDK 9 and is now available for testing in early-access, build 111.

I ran the Tomcat 9 unit tests and there are a whole bunch of failures (everything passed with the previous ea release). It looks like some of our memory leak prevention tricks no longer work. That probably means we either need to find a way around the new Java 9 restrictions or we need to raise

[Bug 56126] 8.0.1 Regression with Spring with AspectJ Load-Time Weaving

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56126 --- Comment #7 from mda...@emergencycallworx.com --- We are using spring-instrumentation on load using spring-instrument-tomcat-4.2.4 Based on what I'm reading, TomcatInstrumentableClassLoader is no longer

[Bug 59253] IOExceptions in websockets

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59253 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Read/Write errors |IOExceptions in

[Bug 59253] Read/Write errors

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59253 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW

[Bug 59253] Read/Write errors

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59253 --- Comment #2 from jfclere --- 32, 104 and 113 are errno on linux #define EPIPE 32 /* Broken pipe */ #define ECONNRESET 104 /* Connection reset by peer */ #define EHOSTUNREACH113 /* No route to host */ -- You

[Bug 59261] Request getAsyncContext should throw IllegalStateException if async is not started

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261 --- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat --- Maybe that is what the specification says, but using null in this situation is considerably better than using an ISE which should be reserved for some invalid/meaningless situations. Bad

[Bug 59261] Request getAsyncContext should throw IllegalStateException if async is not started

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261 --- Comment #1 from Rob Winch --- I messed up the description some. Sorry about that. It should read: If ServletRequest.getAsyncContext() is invoked and has not been put into asynchronous mode an IllegalStateException should

[Bug 59261] New: Request getAsyncContext should throw IllegalStateException if async is not started

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59261 Bug ID: 59261 Summary: Request getAsyncContext should throw IllegalStateException if async is not started Product: Tomcat 8 Version: 8.0.33 Hardware: PC

[GitHub] tomcat-maven-plugin pull request: Bind Tomcat to an address via co...

Github user seanking closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/15 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

[GitHub] tomcat-maven-plugin pull request: add "clientAuth" parameter for t...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/12 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

svn commit: r1737348 - in /tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat7-war-runner/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/maven/runner: Tomcat7Runner.java Tomcat7RunnerCli.java

Author: olamy Date: Fri Apr 1 11:28:18 2016 New Revision: 1737348 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737348=rev Log: executable war: Bind Tomcat to an address via command-line option #15 Merged pr https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/15 Signed-off-by: olivier lamy

svn commit: r1737347 - /tomcat/maven-plugin/trunk/tomcat6-maven-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/tomcat/maven/plugin/tomcat6/AbstractRunMojo.java

Author: olamy Date: Fri Apr 1 11:28:13 2016 New Revision: 1737347 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737347=rev Log: fix https://github.com/apache/tomcat-maven-plugin/pull/12 Signed-off-by: olivier lamy Modified:

[Bug 59256] SLF4J in default jarsToSkip value in catalina.properties too broad

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256 Violeta Georgieva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

svn commit: r1737341 - in /tomcat/tc8.0.x/trunk: ./ conf/catalina.properties webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: violetagg Date: Fri Apr 1 10:25:04 2016 New Revision: 1737341 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737341=rev Log: Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256 Merged revision 1737339 from tomcat/trunk: slf4j-taglib*.jar should not be excluded from the standard JAR scanning

svn commit: r1737340 - in /tomcat/tc8.5.x/trunk: ./ conf/catalina.properties webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: violetagg Date: Fri Apr 1 10:23:25 2016 New Revision: 1737340 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737340=rev Log: Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256 Merged revision 1737339 from tomcat/trunk: slf4j-taglib*.jar should not be excluded from the standard JAR scanning

svn commit: r1737339 - in /tomcat/trunk: conf/catalina.properties webapps/docs/changelog.xml

Author: violetagg Date: Fri Apr 1 10:21:15 2016 New Revision: 1737339 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1737339=rev Log: Fix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256 slf4j-taglib*.jar should not be excluded from the standard JAR scanning by default. Modified:

[Bug 59256] SLF4J in default jarsToSkip value in catalina.properties too broad

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59256 --- Comment #2 from David Scourfield --- Sure, something like: slf4j-taglib-*.jar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.