Github user pandareen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Good thought @michael-o. I'll get some info from chromium...
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Thanks for the explanation. I hardly believe that Chrome does not implement
`Expires: 0`. At best, we inquire with the Chromium project.
---
Github user pandareen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Okay let me explain.
Case 1. [https://i.imgur.com/tofjYaM.png](https://i.imgur.com/tofjYaM.png)
- When chrome gets a `Cache-Control: no-cache` directive in response header, it
sends
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@pandareen, how do you know that Chrome does not understand it?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
Github user pandareen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@michael-o I built tomcat using `Expires` header as `0`, but chrome is
still not understanding.
Here's a screenshot: [https://i.imgur.com/cSnuVIr.png](url)
---
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
I'd rather use `0` according to the spec. Moreover, it has less bytes to
transfer.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Github user pandareen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@michael-o I think 0 would be confusing. Preformatted string in static
final sounds simpler to me.
---
-
To unsubscribe,
