https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64488
Bug ID: 64488
Summary: EL API: AccessControlException -- Import Handler
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.0.0-M5
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129
--- Comment #29 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mateusz Matela from comment #28)
> (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #27)
> > The patch would have to be very minimal and the behaviour
> > optional to be considered for inclusion
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-9-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-9-trunk/builds/260
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/5211
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64485
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 575a2b3 64485: Fix possible resource leak
575a2b3
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new be5025d 64485: Fix possible resource leak
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64485
--- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat ---
I guess it can be improved, but this problem actually doesn't do anything for
me, so I never care.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129
--- Comment #28 from Mateusz Matela ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #27)
> The patch would have to be very minimal and the behaviour
> optional to be considered for inclusion in Tomcat.
Can you explain why this has to be optional?
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64486
mgrigorov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64486
Bug ID: 64486
Summary: Receiving null/empty request body when SSL enabled
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.31
Hardware: HP
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64485
Vassili Alibabaev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37285|Stacktrace of file open |Stacktrace of file open
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64485
Bug ID: 64485
Summary: UserDatabase Realm leaks os file descriptors for
conf/tomcat-users.xml
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.35
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Hi,
Following on this, as I have raised a PR
https://github.com/docker-library/tomcat/pull/202 to add the SCC options
into the OpenJ9 Docker file to avail this improvement, I got comments
saying that they would do only if upstream recommends.
As all individual users may not know that this option
14 matches
Mail list logo
