This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
violetagg pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push:
new c0934d9 Increment version number for next
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.109 release is now available for voting.
Please note that this is the last Tomcat 7 release.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.109/
The Maven staging repo is:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
violetagg pushed a commit to tag 7.0.109
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 2cdef2c0241cdf70b5edd88d3733a52e6b675047
Author: Violeta Georgieva
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 22 11:34:21 2021 -0700
Tag
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
violetagg pushed a change to tag 7.0.109
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git.
at 2cdef2c (commit)
This tag includes the following new commits:
new 2cdef2c Tag 7.0.109
The 1 revisions
Author: violetagg
Date: Thu Apr 22 19:04:32 2021
New Revision: 47342
Log:
Stage Tomcat 7.0.109
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.109/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.109/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.109/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.109/RELEASE-NOTES
Added: dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.109/bin/extras/tomcat-juli-adapters.jar.sha512
==
--- dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.109/bin/extras/tomcat-juli-adapters.jar.sha512
(added)
+++
On 22/04/2021 18:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Le jeu. 22 avr. 2021 à 17:32, Mark Thomas a écrit :
On 22/04/2021 16:24, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to reuse/add/have a SPI to create ws coders/decoders?
Currently it is a hardcoded factory doing a "new"
It is not wrong per se but it is not usable to plug a custom impl which is
my issue.
@Mark: what about ignoring the default if there is another impl in
serviceloader iteration? Would fix it even if it would create some useless
stuff but recent serviceloader api solves it if we want to avoid it
Le jeu. 22 avr. 2021 à 17:32, Mark Thomas a écrit :
> On 22/04/2021 16:24, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to reuse/add/have a SPI to create ws coders/decoders?
> >
> > Currently it is a hardcoded factory doing a "new"
> > (org.apache.tomcat.websocket.Util#getDecoders
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 1c1fb14930b5ccf19d7dacaf6582c20f8b8658d6
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Wed Apr 21 19:46:04 2021 +0100
Remove
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 7dcf54b7a7f5fdd9560241d25427aba3e8899a84
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Wed Apr 21 12:51:04 2021 +0100
Remove
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit b58cc1149894633ff426b1dd993f2745dfc4a0cc
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Wed Apr 21 09:42:48 2021 +0100
Remove
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit bf5b9feca166557134120f0fc5210588c7b3673d
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 22 17:19:05 2021 +0100
Remove
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git.
from e663ab0 Code clean-up. No functional change. Primarily to trigger a
CI build.
new b58cc11 Remove unnecessary
Romain are you saying that having a service descriptor in this case is
wrong?
On Thu., Apr. 22, 2021, 11:47 a.m. Mark Thomas, wrote:
> On 22/04/2021 16:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > I am not in JPMS Ray.
> >
> > About I think the issue is a "double bug" (well one bug, two step
> >
On 22/04/2021 16:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I am not in JPMS Ray.
About I think the issue is a "double bug" (well one bug, two step
resolutions) since I can drop the SPI registration but
then @ServiceProvider will recreate it so I propose:
1. to drop the explicit SPI registration and keep
On 22/04/2021 16:24, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to reuse/add/have a SPI to create ws coders/decoders?
Currently it is a hardcoded factory doing a "new"
(org.apache.tomcat.websocket.Util#getDecoders for decoders, for encoders it
is a bit worse since there is an instance as a
Hi,
Is it possible to reuse/add/have a SPI to create ws coders/decoders?
Currently it is a hardcoded factory doing a "new"
(org.apache.tomcat.websocket.Util#getDecoders for decoders, for encoders it
is a bit worse since there is an instance as a check here
I am not in JPMS Ray.
About I think the issue is a "double bug" (well one bug, two step
resolutions) since I can drop the SPI registration but
then @ServiceProvider will recreate it so I propose:
1. to drop the explicit SPI registration and keep the default which is 1-1
(even faster but that's
Hi,
I'm gonna tag Tomcat 7 later today.
Regards,
Violeta
Le jeu. 22 avr. 2021 à 16:06, Raymond Augé
a écrit :
> @ServiceProvider is just a hint no?
>
Hmm, didn't check the tomcat specific setup but thought it was adding
META-INF/services/ entry too which is current issue.
Seems you are right and
On Thu., Apr. 22, 2021, 9:46 a.m. Raymond Augé,
wrote:
> @ServiceProvider is just a hint no?
>
> It does not change the implementation behavior... Unless you've found
> otherwise, which would be surprising.
>
To be clear, there is no runtime behavior associated with @ServiceProvider
_unless_
Are you maybe in JPMS mode?
On Thu., Apr. 22, 2021, 9:51 a.m. Raymond Augé,
wrote:
>
>
> On Thu., Apr. 22, 2021, 9:46 a.m. Raymond Augé,
> wrote:
>
>> @ServiceProvider is just a hint no?
>>
>> It does not change the implementation behavior... Unless you've found
>> otherwise, which would be
@ServiceProvider is just a hint no?
It does not change the implementation behavior... Unless you've found
otherwise, which would be surprising.
Ray
On Thu., Apr. 22, 2021, 9:29 a.m. Romain Manni-Bucau,
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Websocket server configurator uses the SPI to load the impl and if not
Hi all,
Websocket server configurator uses the SPI to load the impl and if not
found fallbacks on the hardcoded tomcat default.
Isn't the SPI intended to override the default and
therefore @ServiceProvider breaks this feature?
If not, how to override it globally without doing it on a per endpoint
On 21/04/2021 19:53, Mark Thomas wrote:
Both GitHUb CI and Travis CI have started to report failures due to hash
mismatches for downloaded resources.
I'm not sure what is going on at this point. It doesn't seem to be
related to a faulty mirror or an incorrect download hash in
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new d3a0122 Code clean-up. No functional change.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a change to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git.
from c741d99 Fix use of useInstanceManagerForTags with Tags that are inner
classes
add eac02dc Code clean-up. No
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new e663ab0 Code clean-up. No functional change.
29 matches
Mail list logo
