Mark,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 5:10 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/03/2023 20:53, Igal Sapir wrote:
> > Mark,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:12 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
> >
> >> On 15/03/2023 21:16, Igal Sapir wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> It is mostly solved, and that might be sufficient.
> >>>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66535
--- Comment #2 from Alex West ---
If this is intended behavior, the documentation should be updated to explain
that the configuration setting has a bearing on the amount of time it may take
to transfer WAR files over a slow network, or many
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66535
--- Comment #1 from Alex West ---
Although this may be 'intended' behavior, the code would lead me to believe
that the developers intended this to be a check on whether the file was 'valid'
and whether it had been 'idle' for some time.
I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66535
Bug ID: 66535
Summary: FarmWarDeployer will fail to deploy a WAR file when
maxvalidtime is less than the time it takes to
transfer
Product: Tomcat 9
Version:
gjaekel commented on PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/pull/7#issuecomment-1476245704
Yes, it's in the error log. It's also quite easy to Google for it if you
know that you have to search for the keyword `limitrequestbody`. :o
The dev's of our application in
rainerjung commented on PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/pull/7#issuecomment-1476223841
Thanks for finding the reason. I guess there should have been a log message
in the httpd error log.
I now added the missing item for this change into the httpd CHANGES for
gjaekel commented on PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/pull/7#issuecomment-1476151899
It seems, that the reason is very lame! With
https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/92499e20034485c5e2d29cb85940e309573d976e
the default for _LimitRequestBody_ becomes **1GB**
On 18/03/2023 20:53, Igal Sapir wrote:
Mark,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 2:12 AM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/03/2023 21:16, Igal Sapir wrote:
It is mostly solved, and that might be sufficient.
So while `ant clean test` now completes without failures, the part that
still doesn't work is when I
gjaekel commented on PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/pull/7#issuecomment-1476084475
Dear Mark,
first let my thank you for quick reply. I understand you in a way that this
is already a "death code path" that can't rise issues anymore.
I actually "staring
markt-asf closed pull request #7: Possible issue in ajp_read_fully_from_server()
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/pull/7
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
markt-asf commented on PR #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/pull/7#issuecomment-1476047870
The reason for this code:
http://markmail.org/message/lowlwgb7fs4v3yuq
It aims to ensure that there isn't an attempt to read when the buffer has
insufficient space for a
gjaekel opened a new pull request, #7:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-connectors/pull/7
The the outer `while`-loop was changed to respect a padded length yeas
before. But according to this, imho the `read()` should append the same number
of bytes as a maximum, too. If I'm wrong,
12 matches
Mail list logo
